Orthodoxy believes the same, as the Scriptures make it perfectly clear that we have our own lands

And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; - Acts 17:26

Yeah exactly. Back then, the state in which we live in NOw was unforseeable

No one thought in a million years we would digress so low and allow this to happen

This, being multiculturalism/diversity/globalism

Even the Byzantine Empire, which was "multicultural" had laws against miscegenation (by penalty of death).

Respect

“But some do not like to know about your family Bulgarian, and turn to a foreign culture and language and do not take care of their Bulgarian language, but learning to read and speak Greek and are ashamed to call themselves Bulgarians. Oh foolish and silly fools! Why are you ashamed to call yourself Bulgarian and do not read and do not speak its language? Or Bulgarians had no kingdom and country? So many years they reigned and were glorious and mrochuti throughout the land, and many times have taken strong tax Romans and Greeks wise. And kings and kings gave them their royal daughters for wives to have peace and love with Bulgarian kings. The Slavonic race most glorious were Bulgarians, first they called themselves kings, first they had patriarch, first they were baptized, most land they conquered. So the Slavonic race were the strongest and most honored and the first Slavic saints and shined from Bulgarian people and language, and this in turn wrote in this story. And for that Bulgaria the witness have a lot of stories because everything is true for Bulgarians, as already mentioned.” - St Paisius of Bulgaria

Christian nationalism wasn't even very pan-European...here in the States we kinda have to be, since most of us are Euro-mutts, but back when European nations were very different culturally from each other, Christians disavowed pan-Europeanism (granted, they would unite when the Muslims, Mongols, or Khazars invaded).

Only in newton, Ma can someone leave their brand new lenovo thinkpad unattended fod more than 45 minutes holy fuck

Based Orthodoxy

i don't like a good chunk of the people in that poster

Episode 4 was 🔥 @Tony Hovater @MatthewHeimbach the discussion on Christianity and the story of the priest at the ancient monastery was awesome

<:basedduke:374716952343609355> thanks man

I like most...

I don't like Savitri the most.

Not a big fan of Pierce, Serrano, or David Lane.

Don't like Tommasi or Mason, either

Day 4: still sick as a dog

I wanna point out that I got sick the same day I quit smoking

@John Mosby You don't like Pierce?

everyone likes Pierce

No to David Lane? 14 words

I don't like Tommasi but i like the aesthetic of the NSLF

Mason has kinda just become a meme at this point

When I came into the Movement, you had either Pierce or Butler...I went the CI route, and disliked Pierce for his anti-working class attitudes and his anti-Christian rhetoric.

Im not saying I hate him, just never been a fan.

I never got into Lane, cuz he was anti-Christian, and the books he wrote in prison about making 14 year old prostitutes into war-brides was cringy....

I use to write to Bruce Pierce and David Tate, while they were still alive, and I LOVED them...Lane was just my least favorite of the Silent Brotherhood.

@RagBat What's poppin nigger

For the record, too, Bruce and David 100% supported the methods TWP is using...they completely disavowed revolutionary action, in this current age, due to the lack of fruits it bore back when the Silent Brotherhood adopted that model.

Who's Butler?

Christian Identity guy i guess

I never thought Pierce was anti-working class

McVeigh really fucked us

Richard Butler (founder of Aryan Nations).

Ya, Piece hated skins (which I have always been), and was shitty towards working-class guys I know who use to work on his property, cuz he viewed them as "lesser-thans", due to their economic status.

@Fash Dragon

If u believe McVeigh even did it...I don't

No offense to you, comrade, but I've always been repulsed by skins. it's why it took me the better part of a decade to come to the movement

nothing against you

@John Mosby I've never heard that theory but I am open to it

Skins served their purpose.

but seeing Pierce's repudiation of the skinhead movement made me feel comfortable. Obviously, you are an important constituent piece of our movement, but the aesthetic always turned me off

I don't agree with the way they operated but they did the job that white men weren't doing for decades

there's a school of thought that claims Skins to be ZOG fools

then there's another that lashes back against that idea

@Tarnfurt

I came into the skinhead movement back in 2005...this was before the skinhead culture got taken over by the druggies and degenerates...I've just held onto it (I dont really dress like a skin, though).

I always trusted skins more than other WNs, cuz they had your back, and weren't scared to fight (literally) for what they believed.

i know that now