Message from @Fash Dragon
Discord ID: 393245106184126464
Just trying to understand
Their idea of socialism is quite different from ours
That's a failure of the English language
^
There's no good way to concisely explain complex ideas
German is a great language for that tbh
Great language in general.
People who say it's an ugly language are fools
Familiarize them with Wagner
Oughta change their minds real quick
The most beautiful language is Finnish
The funny thing is, the communists say the movement was inherently capitalist, and the capitalists say we are socialists and the socialists say we are Capitalists or the reverse of communism and nothing more
Prove me wrong
None of them can give me a straight answer
It's a third position
It rejects both communism and capitalism
It is socialist in that there are many programs to benefit the common people, protect the workers, etc
But at the same time it supports free Enterprise
Because it is understood that free people do not work without incentive
Such as the nationalization of certain industries critical to the nation of people?
Or
Yeah kinda
Personally I like the idea of industries which are nationalized with free market alternatives
I think the postal service in the US is a good example
Or the water systems
Exactly
Ahh ok
I think any essential service should have free market alternatives personally
Free Enterprise and Capitalism are not synonyms
What's the difference?
Free enterprise is kinda the natural mode of operation for people
No bulli I'm new
How so?
It's based on incentive.
People want to eat. People want homes
People acquire resources to meet these needs
And they do so of their own accord. That's free enterprise to my understanding
So is there any possibility for free enterprise and the National good to come into conflict?
Capitalism takes it up a few extra levels. It allows for a lot more exploitation
Does anyone else care to jump in? I'm not the best at economics