hue

Alright, legit question

@I'mGoingBerserk http://i.imgur.com/N6Gk1KX.mp4

How exactly do NatSoc and Fascism differ? I know the deets on NatSoc and I know the two aren't the same, but Fascism's definition seems to change all the fucking time

Mussolini didn't believe in race preservation so I got kinda turned off from Italian Fascism

I think natsoc is abit more authoriarian. Though they are pretty similar, the rpoblem is that the definitions are more varied than the word fuck

Doesn't Fascism have more central planning?

Like Mosleys fascism is differrent from half the definitions and mussolinis fascism

And I'm positive it's much less racially conscous

It has a central leader and government yes. It focuses more on culture and tradition but doesn't forget race...

It's like civic nationalism++

for example if you were black but your family went may wayy generations in the UK then fine

but if you are a cheap fucking import immigrant then you go back

"Race? It is a feeling, not a reality. Ninety-five per cent, at least. Nothing will ever make me believe that biologically pure races can be shown to exist today.… National pride has no need of the delirium of race." - Benito

So I guess Mussolini had a more Trumpian position on race

Oswald mosley did actually support a european union, but wanted it based in european socalism and nurting of the roots of culture in the nations of europe...

instead we got racemixing culture destoryoing marxist EU

So basically International Socialism?

Never thought I'd say that

Marxist socalism

yes

but we must rember Mosley saw two world wars and fought in one

tr00

he wanted to end war more than anything

So his motivation was simply the idea of Europe getting along

Understandable

A european brotherhood

Right

if europe could work together then anything could be achived

If there was ever a time where a European brotherhood would be needed, it's right now

Exactly, it was a chame the EU destroyed most peoples hopes of that. A real brotherhood would not be trusted because of the globalists financers in brussles

shame*

Yep. Essentially what the EU ended up being was an international clique (wink wink nudge nudge) that works in its own interest at the expense of the countries it supposedly represents

^thats for chat bew

It was unelected and unaccountable, expensive, got little done and what it did was was never in the interest of the people. they tried to uproot the cultral roots of the tree of europe

Say what you will about Uncle Adolf, but he was right on the money in terms of international jewry

And yeh, you got it

Same with mosley. International financers put poor sould in china and india in dirty sweatshops to work all fay for $2 and work their health away, all to line their pockets

poor souls*

day*