Final point: societies with advanced capitalists systems have a declining population, the opposite of overpopulation. Do they seek to argue capitalism as a solution and saviour to more populous nations? What a sham. These advanced societies in the West and East Asian (Japan, South Korea etc.) are cannibalising their own population with the slogans, 'choose a career or a family, you cannot do both', or 'just consume and be a child forever, no one needs pesky responsibilities like children'. They do not want to have to 'pay for' and raise the next generation, that would hurt their profits! The response from governments to fill the gap in labour is immigration. Thus the Malthusian argument gets new vigour, as the ideologues pretend to have a solution for all nations. But indeed, without an objective measure, what is the definition of 'under population' or 'over population'. In this economic only frame, they are arbitrary categories according to the 'needs' of the ruling classes. The pursuit of capital has no solution to the population problem, even if it exists. Again, it is posturing and opportunism.

In response, maybe the free market advocates will say: if absolutely necessary, when immigration is no longer feasible, large corporations will have incentive to provide a population stimulus and 'pay' for employees to create new workers (slaves) for them. But they will only do this if there is no other choice, and still, like immigration, it is a stop-gap measure. Capitalists can only be proactive about profits, everything else is reactionary and suffers as a result. You have to make the argument that private ownership and control of by the few is the 'best possible solution'. It clearly isn't, especially not in this case. And this is where the critique of Marxism comes in.

Q: What does opportunism mean in the Marxist context?

why are u spamming? Oh, you are a retarded.

Just block him

This is hilariously cringey.

I think you'll find it is actually Autism.

@Deleted User 'Q: What does opportunism mean in the Marxist context?' opportunism is basically any subtle distortion from the correct path. http://www.iccr.gr/en/news/Some-characteristics-of-opportunism-in-America/

There is also revisionism. Revisionism is doing the same but openly.

Revisionism <:BlobHyperThink:317088659331481600>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPm0NKcBZcY

Mmmmm. I imagine her having a beautiful black baby growing inside her right this moment

The baby would obviously be aborted.

Can't have her fans and family getting wise to what's up.

Cant be a minority if they're all killed

Wtf theres no stalin emojis?

Stalin pointing at his head

🤔

Ooooooh

Oooooooh

Ooooooooh

so whats up whith you guys?

HAHAHA COMMIES ARE FUCKING BRAINWASHED

HOW DUMBED DOWN DO YOU HAVE TO BE TO BECOME COMMUNIST?

🤔

This lecture series has been good to watch. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tFW6EjxP2K8

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hegel-dialectics/

Communism and Catholicism is not compatible.
https://w2.vatican.va/content/pius-xi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xi_enc_19370319_divini-redemptoris.html

Marx’s objection to empiricism rests upon this: that its attention is directed exclusively to the source of knowledge, but not the form of that knowledge. For economic theory, Marx considered it vital to examine economic forms and why political economy ignored this matter. https://www.marxists.org/archive/pilling/works/capital/pilling2.htm

sad!

Hello.

asdf

We are safe here, comrades.

@Martin @Deleted User come

Your non-arguments have no power here.

LMAOO

@Deleted User !!! KURWA

loooooooool