No I think the issue is that you cannot structure a sentence without it being a jumble of a bunch of letters, and grammar that dosen't make any sense.

But I can't blame you for that.

a please, you derail if i miss a comma

are you sure you dont have reading dyslectia

Pretty damn sure, otherwise I would have noticed by now.

@Offender Ooooooh somebody is angry!

so this is how it ends

I Said, maybe i should type in all caps for you to understand

@Offender >Ciritizes people for flaming
>Does flaming himself

but you dont believe in morality

so why does it matter

@Deleted User Well damn, dosen't mean that logical fallacies are not a thing!

if you dont believe in morrality, give us one good reason not to brick you in the head?

well we cant

hes literally not anywhere near us

he doesnt believes in moorality

@Offender Why the sudden change in attitude?

a oke, logistics. i was speaking hypothetical btw

@Offender Try throwing the brick at the computer screen.

no change im just asking. it is not meant a s a threat

if a indidual has no morality, how can you trust him in your socity ?

Laws, they do exist.

you need morals to follow laws

or fear

No you don't.

if it is fear it leads to hate, so it is you against the law.

you can kill law np and get away with it

Fear, want, or necessity.

well the want and neessity dont disepear if you dont have morality

it will increase those needs satifaction because of corruption

you can get away with crime

some crimes are worth the time

They won't dissapear after everything goes to hell and they go potentially years without any form of governance.

Why do I have a feeling this will be a jumbled mess?

so, you are saying that the o moral individual is thinking : i follow the rules because the socity precist" knowingly that one person doesnt changes any thing and that there are others breaking the rules

And as I predicted, I cannot make any sense of this.

you are just stupid

Ayy

theredamerican is on 4days no sleep and gets me

What?

goodnight