but like i said

Those are all medieval sects.

a military isnt needed to wage war

No, only banks.

before, it was warriors

Warriors fight for a cause.

and their own decision to align

Soldiers fight for banks.

so there have always been soldiers and never warriors?

There were only warriors...then banks showed up.

my mistake

A conquered warrior is a soldier.

but you see

what you say

Warriors will bring the banks down.

only relates to maybe credibly organised empires

like rome

Soldiers will stand there and watch.

That, or try and fight the warriors.

but warriors existed alongside soldiers in the world

Yes, but those warriors never liked soldiers.

a warrior is a spirit, master of his own mind

In fact, those warriors all fought for different reasons.

they fought for themselves and the love of their king

No warrior fought for a king.

and the king treated capable warriors like his sons

They fought for an idea.

ofc they did

Only soldiers fight for kings.

for their culture

of which the king

Name one warrior that fought for a king.

is the symbol of their culture

xD

easy

viking raiders

fought for wealth

They were soldiers.

and for the king

...........

Very good soldiers.