wars havent always been fought by formal militaries
Skull and Bones society.
in fact
A masonic sect.
up to the middle ages
no wars were fought by a formal military
people trained for war
made their own equipment
How about the Jesuits, they control the military/intelligence/assassinations.
and kings made their own choice when to go war
Even the Templars...they control banking.
Get the picture?
in the modern frame, yes
but like i said
Those are all medieval sects.
a military isnt needed to wage war
No, only banks.
before, it was warriors
Warriors fight for a cause.
and their own decision to align
Soldiers fight for banks.
so there have always been soldiers and never warriors?
There were only warriors...then banks showed up.
my mistake
A conquered warrior is a soldier.
but you see
what you say
Warriors will bring the banks down.
only relates to maybe credibly organised empires
like rome
Soldiers will stand there and watch.
That, or try and fight the warriors.
but warriors existed alongside soldiers in the world
Yes, but those warriors never liked soldiers.
a warrior is a spirit, master of his own mind
In fact, those warriors all fought for different reasons.
they fought for themselves and the love of their king
No warrior fought for a king.
and the king treated capable warriors like his sons
They fought for an idea.
ofc they did
