like the crown holds the executive power while parliament holding the legislative

well I'm not particularly fond of monarchs I mean if the ruler is decided by succession laws and not really by any merit whatsoever(you can claim that there is no "merit" in democracy either but someone running for PM/President have at least to gain some popularity) and can't be replaced if he's obviously incapable of doing his job right, then what? you will inevitably end up with a bunch of idiots on the throne

there were excellent kings who exhibited unmatched strategic sense but there was even more of no name turds

I don't see a reason to give anything to anyone by birth

my idea was creating a commite with no political power that observes the heir during his growth to determine if he is capable, also he will be taught in morals and state theory and such

also it could be an elected monarchy

every dynasty picks one heir and a commitee votes for the most capable

if it's elected monarchy why not simply a republic then 🤷

or aristocratic family rather

you know we've had an elected monarchy in Poland

the plebs cant vote tho

dunno if you're familiar with that

our nobles were voting for the king

and it went down the shitter real fast

why?

game of thrones like intrigue?

or was the elected guy just a twat

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/d/dd/Polish-Lithuanian_Commonwealth_at_its_maximum_extent.svg/1280px-Polish-Lithuanian_Commonwealth_at_its_maximum_extent.svg.png

>go from this

>to nothing

>in 200 years

👌

wew

cuz we ended up having a string of idiots on the throne

thats why we need an impartial council

later on any polish-lithuanian king would be effectively elected by foreign powers...

>my idea was creating a commite with no political power that observes the heir during his growth to determine if he is capable, also he will be taught in morals and state theory and such

that's what was more or less happening, I mean not really the first part but the heirs would get education and shit

well the first part is the important one tho

why limit yourself to only those people from the royal family?

less of a hassle

there are thousands even more capable politicians out there

>less of a hassle

royalty has better access to education cuz they are rich and dont need to work

why is "hassle" bad

democratic process was designed to ensure fair and effective transition of power

it works

>royalty has better access to education cuz they are rich and dont need to work
modern elites are basically royalty too, they receive top tier education

thats we still have an elected parliament

thats the whole point

its that the elite