reuters arent very opinion based

that it exist mostly on yt and in the internet?

they just give actual news

because they are fucking trash

right wingers make trash media

they're all even more biased than any mainstream outlet you call biased

yes they are

no one is denying that

this is the problem i have

people shit on right sources for being right wing

>reuters arent very opinion based
there are basically no opinoins in reuters is a fucking news agency its pure information

yet the lefty sources get nothing

thats why reuters is based

cnn doesnt get memed for being just as biased

or nbc

>cnn doesnt get memed for being just as biased

it fucking does

even better example

you're doing it right now

yes only recently after trump

and 30% of the US

but any article has some hints of personal opinion

but for like the 20 years before that no one did

humans arent perfect

I think it's alright that extremist views aren't given a platform

>hurr durr let me say I hate fucking niggers on national tv

whats your point stryker

extremist views need a platform the most

I dont care about what they need

they are fucked in the head

if you cant openly debate certain views

then u got a problem

I can openly debate against anyone

but centrist politicians nowadays can't

when did i say we need to say niggers on tv

im not saying we need more extremism

im pointing out the hypocrisy for saying media has less liberal bias because dude look at fox

I don't agree with this putting all media in one basket

every news source is going to have liberal bias unless its controlled opposition because jews

but lets look at american tv channels, which is where most amerifats get their info

nbc liberal

fox conservative