>reuters arent very opinion based
there are basically no opinoins in reuters is a fucking news agency its pure information

yet the lefty sources get nothing

thats why reuters is based

cnn doesnt get memed for being just as biased

or nbc

>cnn doesnt get memed for being just as biased

it fucking does

even better example

you're doing it right now

yes only recently after trump

and 30% of the US

but any article has some hints of personal opinion

but for like the 20 years before that no one did

humans arent perfect

I think it's alright that extremist views aren't given a platform

>hurr durr let me say I hate fucking niggers on national tv

whats your point stryker

extremist views need a platform the most

I dont care about what they need

they are fucked in the head

if you cant openly debate certain views

then u got a problem

I can openly debate against anyone

but centrist politicians nowadays can't

when did i say we need to say niggers on tv

im not saying we need more extremism

im pointing out the hypocrisy for saying media has less liberal bias because dude look at fox

I don't agree with this putting all media in one basket

every news source is going to have liberal bias unless its controlled opposition because jews

but lets look at american tv channels, which is where most amerifats get their info

nbc liberal

fox conservative

cnn liberal

cspan liberal

abc pretty neutral compared to the others

seems like conservative views are wrong

and no one wants them

cbs liberal

@Stryker why is every single scientists and every single intelligent person in the world for that regard leftist ?

yeah and what do you propose to do with that

because the politically active ones tend to be more liberal

whats your problem with nbc and all the others