It serves to purpose to me to do that.

wouldn't you?

I do not reject murdering infants on a moral basis.

because the morality of murdering the infant is contextual

Who wouldnt kill a baby in order to save the world?

exactly

Thats called morals

pretty much no one

I certainly wouldn’t, unless it’s foretold to be like Stalin 2.0 or some shit.

exactly

Nigga

you would kill a baby to save the world

I'd kill the baby until there was nothing left

or do what is saving the world in your eyes

<:GWskarzzLUL:396058315186110465>

Myep.

morality is real

it's just not external

Nah.

it all depends on how you were raised and your genetics

these things determine what you believe to be good and bad

and that stands on top of every last second of human evolution

I'd feel horrible killing the baby of course

If I cannot hold it, if I cannot see it, if I cannot feel it, and if it does not have any physical impact, then I do not consider it real.

you cannot deny that

but I still would obviously

but what the fuck

objectivists permanently trying not to be btfo

what context is there to it?

I am not an objectivist.

I would never kill a baby

Ayn Rand is a doodoo head.

or anyone because I simply dont have to

not objectivists

uhhh

what is it called

"If I cannot hold it, if I cannot see it, if I cannot feel it, and if it does not have any physical impact, then I do not consider it real."

this shit

if I had no choice and it was the only way to save the world and its going to die well I dont really have a choice

there's a word for this line of thinking

i feel like