Many do actually

Therefore, I reject this idea of morality.

Kk

because although details of morality can be argued about forever, nature dictates that humans are a collaborative species and because of this our big brain has developed some objective morals like "not murdering" and "helping accomplish goals" to assist in that

Pretty dumb but ok

lol

Close to lassiez-faire

@Anarchist-Communist no

you are wrong

Nope nope nope

I do not need morals to act on this.

completely and totally wrong

I act on epathy.

define morals

More spooks, lol.

@Husky no u

@Husky commies and christians are the same

@Anarchist-Communist Would you murder an infant in cold blood?

No, mr e

I would

yeah

No.

Because Im alt lit

if it meant he could save the world

he would

leaning

It serves to purpose to me to do that.

wouldn't you?

I do not reject murdering infants on a moral basis.

because the morality of murdering the infant is contextual

Who wouldnt kill a baby in order to save the world?

exactly

Thats called morals

pretty much no one

I certainly wouldn’t, unless it’s foretold to be like Stalin 2.0 or some shit.

exactly

Nigga

you would kill a baby to save the world

I'd kill the baby until there was nothing left

or do what is saving the world in your eyes

<:GWskarzzLUL:396058315186110465>