At least in a world war, there would be a change of leadership.

Current society prevents us all from evolving.

@rail5 good book on anarchism https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1920/lwc/

guys i need help with this economic assignment question- problem with resource allocation in mixed economy can be effectively solved through focused market and process planning, give two facts to suppport the statement

Who knows.

If Trump really goes to North Korea.

Then he'll probably get killed.

We can only hope.

That wouldn't be good.

That would spark war.

And unlike all of you, I like not being nuked.

We wouldn't be nuked...our governments would be.

Depending on where you live.

Imagine every corrupt government/empire crumbling all at the same time.

Freedom.

Death to america then

Death to the imperialist jews

Death to government.

It's gonna be a WW2 all over again.

With many more nukes.

And death.

Actually, much less.

Much more.

Tactical nukes in every capital of every superpower would be a far less death toll than WW2.

@rail5 another great book https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1906/12/x01.htm

thanks @Firefly

ohfugg.jpg

Nuclear fallout is just a meme

As long as you're far enough from a major city or strategic target you'll be fine

Exactly...so let WW3 commence!

HAPPENING https://twitter.com/Dalatrm/status/984011488938643456

@Firefly gotta say, havent touched on the book by lenin you sent, but after reading the first chapter of "anarchism or socialism" - despite not being an anarchist myself - it's a bunch of nonsense

"the anarchists say this but here look at this twisted example that isn't really an example of what i just quoted, see it doesn't match up"
"proponents of metaphysics believe this [cites Engels]"
i mean cmon

Maybe if we do get nuked the world will turn into Fallout, which is essentially AnCapitalist.

<:bour:313709044957315082>

@rail5 you can probably find the articles of Georgian Anarchists in translation. He was arguing against them.

You don't think he was arguing modern American one do you?

not at all, i'll read up on that and maybe it'll bring some clarity

just seemed like a bunch of linguistic gymnastics to me on a first read

Let's concentrate on the main points in the book.