Message from @NeoFuturist

Discord ID: 669025310338973706


2020-01-21 03:40:50 UTC  

"Im against gay marriage"
---- In a homophobic speech X said that he was against fundamental human rights

2020-01-21 03:41:17 UTC  

When you control what everyone sees, they only see what you want them to

2020-01-21 03:41:44 UTC  

"Kill all faggots"
--- In a homophobic speech X said that he was against fundamental human rights, except it validates their narrative

2020-01-21 03:42:08 UTC  

The result is the same

2020-01-21 03:42:25 UTC  

Its a distinction without much of a difference

2020-01-21 03:42:25 UTC  

yes but one is going to legitimize them more than the other

2020-01-21 03:42:40 UTC  

its going to make it harder to rally around that person

2020-01-21 03:42:42 UTC  

They already have the legitimacy

2020-01-21 03:42:57 UTC  

you arnt taking if from them

2020-01-21 03:42:59 UTC  

They have the frame not the legitimacy

2020-01-21 03:43:01 UTC  

this is the status quo

2020-01-21 03:43:16 UTC  

Those who have the frame have the legitimacy

2020-01-21 03:43:18 UTC  

@Zemo not much of a difference in practicality

2020-01-21 03:44:03 UTC  

That may be true, but it’s not as if they’re aren’t measures we can take to maximize our own legitimacy

2020-01-21 03:44:23 UTC  

minimizing theirs will be more effective

2020-01-21 03:45:03 UTC  

Maximizing yours while they still have theirs is impossible anyways

2020-01-21 03:45:13 UTC  

We would need a media apparatus comparable to theirs in order to accomplish that

2020-01-21 03:45:21 UTC  

In a situation like this legitimacy is a zero sum game

2020-01-21 03:46:56 UTC  

in other words, you have to weaken them and take over or replace some of their power in order to gain some form of legitimacy or the ability to somewhat frame things for yourself in a meaningful way.

2020-01-21 03:47:09 UTC  

Before that you are pond scum

2020-01-21 03:47:43 UTC  

people still see things though.
we can't control the enemy, but we can at least make ourselves less fringe to those who are swayable. optics could be part of respectability

2020-01-21 03:47:58 UTC  

people will judge you on what you wear on your sleeve

2020-01-21 03:48:51 UTC  

@NeoFuturist totally agreed in that point, dress up a bit. But it's not that by dressing up they will treat you with kid gloves.

2020-01-21 03:49:06 UTC  

yeah sure, i agree

2020-01-21 03:49:23 UTC  

both optics and respectability are important, we shouldn't downplay either

2020-01-21 03:49:25 UTC  

I agree as well

2020-01-21 03:49:49 UTC  

Optics and Respectability are one in the same in my mind

2020-01-21 03:50:05 UTC  

thinking about it now, optics could be a part of respectability

2020-01-21 03:50:19 UTC  

Respectability is everything

2020-01-21 03:50:25 UTC  

optics is your choice of aesthetics, wording, culture, and looks

2020-01-21 03:50:48 UTC  

people judge on that, and if they judge you bad, your respectability is damaged, no?

2020-01-21 03:51:24 UTC  

the right is not respectable by the enemy, but we could be respectable for some near the middle

2020-01-21 03:51:31 UTC  

It only matters if that is actually what you are.
If its just a look (which 90% of people view optics as) then your wasting your time.

2020-01-21 03:51:58 UTC  

i think looks can reflect the soul of the thing

2020-01-21 03:52:10 UTC  

wignats show what they feel and act

2020-01-21 03:52:32 UTC  

Humans are highly visually driven creatures

2020-01-21 03:52:34 UTC  

how you dress is a form of art in my eyes, which is why we need more art

2020-01-21 03:52:51 UTC  

Hawaiian shirt nationalism?

2020-01-21 03:52:57 UTC  

hah lmao

2020-01-21 03:53:07 UTC  

i mean, not my favorite, but if it works

2020-01-21 03:53:08 UTC  

And even then though it may be called Optics, it’s much more than just a look