?

incels are mad mainly about that

hey bro can you tell me more about the study? I dont understand what they mean by predicted the romantic interest? Did they ask the girls if theyd be interested in them, was it based on them meeting certain diff guys or what?

also that women are hypergamous

read the abstract

if i tell you then youll want scientific proof

if i give you proof youll want it summarized

if i summarize it youll want proof of what im saying

then youll ahhhhhh

its circular logic lol

"iecause of the sample collected, we only looked at the predictors of romantic interest for heterosexual participants. The extent to which these results would generalize to LGBT populations is unclear. Also, we looked at predictors of romantic interest for a relatively young sample, and it would be interesting to see whether results are different for older populations. Finally, we only examined predictors of self-reported romantic interest. It was clear to participants that we were not offering the opportunity to meet the targets, or go on a date with them. So we are uncertain about the extent to which our results generalize to actual dating behavior."

"Finally, we only examined predictors of self-reported romantic interest. It was clear to participants that we were not offering the opportunity to meet the targets, or go on a date with them. So we are "

hmm

what?

the part about actual dating behavior?

thats how you write scientifically

they cant be 100% sure that it carries over to dating

so they say that

m8 it seems they showed some information about people who they never met, and pictures of them, ? correct?

thats like the argument "oh it doesnt say in the global warming papers that they are 10000% sure so gotcha"

human-caused global warming is fake af

yes

there are other reasons to debunk global warming

but the specific argument that "they arent sure" is bullshit

when scientists write papers they arent 100% sure about anything

they present data

and a conclusion

I simply mean that its pretty limited, they never actually met the people in person or anything,

thats it

then read another

the studies add up

think about it this way

its so limited "In the study, 335 college students watched videos of potential romantic partners of the opposite sex talking about themselves."

they literally watched videos of them

how many studies are there contradicting the blackpill?

i cant find them

@george murray its a limit of that experiment

is that the criticism you have?

listen to yourself lol

It just doesn't seemr eally important to me, they just watched videos of them didn't really get to know them, and they happen to like the more GL ones

and be more interested in them