Message from @george murray

Discord ID: 482737976871354368


2018-08-25 02:25:08 UTC  

LOOKS

2018-08-25 02:25:10 UTC  

ARE

2018-08-25 02:25:12 UTC  

THE

2018-08-25 02:25:13 UTC  

MAIN

2018-08-25 02:25:16 UTC  

FACTOR

2018-08-25 02:25:21 UTC  

DATING

2018-08-25 02:25:25 UTC  

SUCCESS

2018-08-25 02:25:42 UTC  

in dating success

2018-08-25 02:25:49 UTC  

is that clear

2018-08-25 02:25:50 UTC  

?

2018-08-25 02:25:58 UTC  

incels are mad mainly about that

2018-08-25 02:26:04 UTC  

hey bro can you tell me more about the study? I dont understand what they mean by predicted the romantic interest? Did they ask the girls if theyd be interested in them, was it based on them meeting certain diff guys or what?

2018-08-25 02:26:05 UTC  

also that women are hypergamous

2018-08-25 02:26:15 UTC  

read the abstract

2018-08-25 02:26:25 UTC  

if i tell you then youll want scientific proof

2018-08-25 02:26:37 UTC  

if i give you proof youll want it summarized

2018-08-25 02:26:53 UTC  

if i summarize it youll want proof of what im saying

2018-08-25 02:26:56 UTC  

then youll ahhhhhh

2018-08-25 02:27:17 UTC  

its circular logic lol

2018-08-25 02:28:10 UTC  

"iecause of the sample collected, we only looked at the predictors of romantic interest for heterosexual participants. The extent to which these results would generalize to LGBT populations is unclear. Also, we looked at predictors of romantic interest for a relatively young sample, and it would be interesting to see whether results are different for older populations. Finally, we only examined predictors of self-reported romantic interest. It was clear to participants that we were not offering the opportunity to meet the targets, or go on a date with them. So we are uncertain about the extent to which our results generalize to actual dating behavior."

2018-08-25 02:28:22 UTC  

"Finally, we only examined predictors of self-reported romantic interest. It was clear to participants that we were not offering the opportunity to meet the targets, or go on a date with them. So we are "

2018-08-25 02:28:24 UTC  

hmm

2018-08-25 02:28:59 UTC  

what?

2018-08-25 02:29:11 UTC  

the part about actual dating behavior?

2018-08-25 02:29:26 UTC  

thats how you write scientifically

2018-08-25 02:29:42 UTC  

they cant be 100% sure that it carries over to dating

2018-08-25 02:29:45 UTC  

so they say that

2018-08-25 02:30:14 UTC  

m8 it seems they showed some information about people who they never met, and pictures of them, ? correct?

2018-08-25 02:30:23 UTC  

thats like the argument "oh it doesnt say in the global warming papers that they are 10000% sure so gotcha"

2018-08-25 02:30:33 UTC  

human-caused global warming is fake af

2018-08-25 02:30:37 UTC  

yes

2018-08-25 02:30:53 UTC  

there are other reasons to debunk global warming

2018-08-25 02:31:12 UTC  

but the specific argument that "they arent sure" is bullshit

2018-08-25 02:31:36 UTC  

when scientists write papers they arent 100% sure about anything

2018-08-25 02:31:40 UTC  

they present data

2018-08-25 02:31:46 UTC  

and a conclusion

2018-08-25 02:31:47 UTC  

I simply mean that its pretty limited, they never actually met the people in person or anything,

2018-08-25 02:31:48 UTC  

thats it

2018-08-25 02:31:56 UTC  

then read another

2018-08-25 02:32:01 UTC  

the studies add up

2018-08-25 02:32:17 UTC  

think about it this way