Message from @george murray

Discord ID: 482735641021382667


2018-08-25 02:16:22 UTC  

ok

2018-08-25 02:16:25 UTC  

i have shit to do

2018-08-25 02:16:27 UTC  

read up

2018-08-25 02:16:36 UTC  

theres more too

2018-08-25 02:16:38 UTC  

a lot

2018-08-25 02:16:39 UTC  

lmao

2018-08-25 02:17:00 UTC  
2018-08-25 02:17:03 UTC  
2018-08-25 02:17:36 UTC  

haiiiiiiiii ❤

2018-08-25 02:17:48 UTC  

wat

2018-08-25 02:18:05 UTC  

what're your pronouns

2018-08-25 02:18:19 UTC  

come on

2018-08-25 02:18:33 UTC  

are you really gonna ignore the stuff i posted

2018-08-25 02:18:39 UTC  

are you male

2018-08-25 02:18:46 UTC  

yes

2018-08-25 02:18:52 UTC  

will you be my bf

2018-08-25 02:19:05 UTC  

I am too

2018-08-25 02:19:23 UTC  

what is wrong with you? lol

2018-08-25 02:19:27 UTC  

no i wont be your bf

2018-08-25 02:19:34 UTC  

k

2018-08-25 02:20:25 UTC  

so are you gonna read them or not?

2018-08-25 02:21:13 UTC  

boi

2018-08-25 02:21:32 UTC  

im not gonna be your bf

2018-08-25 02:21:49 UTC  

but im gonna slam your ass if you made me post that shit for nothing

2018-08-25 02:21:57 UTC  

All you did was drop a shitload of scientific articles. You didn't explain to me how they confirm any of your statements. That's not how a discussion works. Give me specific evidence for a specific claim, not gonna read 10 articles m8

2018-08-25 02:22:36 UTC  

For example, if I say 99% of all rapes come from men, I can confirm that claim with one specific source. I don't need 10 different articles, talking about 10 different topics

2018-08-25 02:22:46 UTC  

So either stick up to discussion standarts or gfto

2018-08-25 02:22:50 UTC  

the majority of them are about how physical attractiveness is the main predictor of success in relationships

2018-08-25 02:22:53 UTC  

@PugSlugger I already was

2018-08-25 02:22:54 UTC  

trying to read it

2018-08-25 02:22:58 UTC  

but its a lot of stuff

2018-08-25 02:23:01 UTC  

can you quote specific

2018-08-25 02:23:01 UTC  

stuff

2018-08-25 02:23:11 UTC  

or establish the point you wantto make

2018-08-25 02:23:55 UTC  

Overall, we found sex differences in trait perception, with female responders more often coming to an agreement in their perception of the male targets’ traits than male responders with female targets. However, there were strong halo effects in trait perception for women. A closer examination suggested that the female responders’ ratings of the targets’ Big-Five personality factors were mostly driven by their ratings of the targets’ mate value and slow life history strategy. Finally, we found that of all of the traits and score types assessed, romantic interest was only predicted by the responders’ perception of the targets’ physical attractiveness, with no moderating effect of the responders’ sex. Specifically, responders’ were interested in targets’ who they perceived to be higher than themselves on physical attractiveness. Thus, we found partial support for the third hypothesis (high or higher values on socially desirable traits predicts attraction) and for the fifth hypothesis (readily perceived traits predict attraction) because these hypotheses were only supported for physical attractiveness. We found no support for the first hypothesis (similarity predicts attraction), for the second hypothesis (dissimilarity predicts attraction), or for the fourth hypothesis (sex moderates what predicts attraction). These effects will be discussed in turn in the next sections.

2018-08-25 02:23:55 UTC  

like "claim" heres my proof *posts link or quotes*

2018-08-25 02:23:57 UTC  

k