but this thing he posted doesnt do that

so its equally as invalid

And yet I've corroborated my evidence, yet you refuse to even acknowledge this

dude, I already told you that you could be completely correct

Whatever the point you're trying to prove is irrelevant and false altogether

its just debate tips

from someone who studies logical reasoning and debate

>ur argument bad hehehe
>dude wtf why are you defending your argument

your argument was bad, but that doesnt mean it was wrong

theres a difference between an argument being sound and an argument being incorrect

Definition of a liberal

its logic 101

dont get so defensive

I'm not going to take argument advice from a teenager who lives in the west

Im not a teenager, you're just getting defensive and lashing out because I attacked the soundness of your argument

I didnt disprove it or claim you were wrong

I can't even call you comrade

if you want to be persuasive, you need to understand logical reasoning

"anecdotal evidence is just not good in an argument
if you go to a gas station every day for a week
and three times that week it gets robbed while you're there
you might get the impression your town is infested with crime
but if that gas station is the only place that got robbed, and your town has lower crime rates than every town around it"

>I'm not a teenager
That's just an anecdote hurr durr

no, its more of an adhom on your part

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem

You can make a fallacy c out of literally anything

no, just the stuff thats fallacious

Argument from fallacy (also known as the fallacy fallacy) – assumption that if an argument for some conclusion is fallacious, then the conclusion is false. Base rate fallacy – making a probability judgment based on conditional probabilities, without taking into account the effect of prior probabilities.

sure, where was I incorrect?

Exactly what you are attempting to do

ok, am I wrong in claiming that anecdotal evidence is fallacious?

or that adhoms are fallacious?

Strawmen fallacy

no, I didnt misrepresent your argument

I asked you for clarification

my argument is that your anecdotal argument isnt a good argument

so Im asking if I am incorrect

or rather, is your argument that I am incorrect?

My argument is that it's 3 am and I'm going to bed instead of arguing with a teenager on discord on how to structure an argument

so if yes, the question is, well is it that anecdotal evidence is actually not fallacious? or did you not actually use anecdotal evidence?

because I would argue you did indeed use anecdotal evidence, and anecdotal evidence is generally agreed to be fallacious

Your argument is irrelevant

so I would conclude I did not make a fallacy fallacy

Conclude whatever you want