you could very well be correct, you were just making a bad argument

Ok buddy

I was posting accounts of the atrocities you deny

Stay btfo

Read the logs

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/anecdotal

>literally everyone wanted the ussr gone
>information proving this wrong is useless

anecdotal evidence is, provide some surveys of people who lived in the USSR

or economic conditions of the USSR that show it had a decent quality of life

>pug posts this https://www.rferl.org/a/belarus-soviet-union/28524493.html
>you don't call this out as anecdotal

GG hypocrite

I didnt see that dude, relax

If you haven't even read a small amount of the argument, then why are you trying to lecture?

Answer that

now personal experience is worth little, but testimony altogether isnt worthless if its corroborated by many other people

like the Holocaust

because I saw your personal example

You literally said first hand witnesses are useless

Argument of redemption much?

?

no

Make up your mind

using your own personal experience is a fallacy

using the testimony of several other people that corroborate each other isnt so

but this thing he posted doesnt do that

so its equally as invalid

And yet I've corroborated my evidence, yet you refuse to even acknowledge this

dude, I already told you that you could be completely correct

Whatever the point you're trying to prove is irrelevant and false altogether

its just debate tips

from someone who studies logical reasoning and debate

>ur argument bad hehehe
>dude wtf why are you defending your argument

your argument was bad, but that doesnt mean it was wrong

theres a difference between an argument being sound and an argument being incorrect

Definition of a liberal

its logic 101

dont get so defensive

I'm not going to take argument advice from a teenager who lives in the west

Im not a teenager, you're just getting defensive and lashing out because I attacked the soundness of your argument

I didnt disprove it or claim you were wrong