Message from @Borzo
Discord ID: 519200713461727233
I asked you for clarification
my argument is that your anecdotal argument isnt a good argument
so Im asking if I am incorrect
or rather, is your argument that I am incorrect?
My argument is that it's 3 am and I'm going to bed instead of arguing with a teenager on discord on how to structure an argument
so if yes, the question is, well is it that anecdotal evidence is actually not fallacious? or did you not actually use anecdotal evidence?
because I would argue you did indeed use anecdotal evidence, and anecdotal evidence is generally agreed to be fallacious
Your argument is irrelevant
so I would conclude I did not make a fallacy fallacy
Conclude whatever you want
in fact, I made sure to avoid the fallacy fallacy by saying your argument might still be correct even if it is unsound since its foundation was anecdotal
I can conclude that you're putting too much thought into this
When I was your age I was partying
its just basic logical reasoning
oh dont worry, Im still partying between studying logical reasoning
Btw I see your a fan of the red on black
yeah, thats a fair takeaway
I made a fifth international symbol similar to yours
ok
yeah, it would be the same with mine
Top of the 5 is the hammer, bottom is the sickle
The star represents the Maoists, as well as five points, symbolising the fifth international
And the significance of 5
yeah, I searched up fifth international
Ok?
oh it just seemed like you were about to explain the significance of the 5, I was just saying I looked it up
I presumed you were aware of the internationals
I was aware of the fourth
1st international - Marx, Engels and co.
2nd international - Paris commune
3rd international - Bolsheviks, and later stalin and co.
and then Trotsky
4th international - Trotsky and co.
5th international - is yet to be officially made
how does it differ from previous movements?
It's not developed yet
so its just the call for it to be developed

