Message from @Overseer Strasser
Discord ID: 549682156012568616
I agree.
Like why do horses exist
lets eat them
Horses aren't for eat, not for sexing either.
They empowered the Aryans (Indo-Europeans) to conquer the swaths of land they did.
Upon the backs of horses; the Europeans, the Iranics, and the Indians were linked by blood & tradition
They arent for riding because most of the population that can afford a horse is overweight and they arent good for war either because now we have things called tanks.
Therefor horses are a luxury and not a need.
Therefor horses are the 1%
Therefor horses are the enemy
They existed for a reason & retain a cultural importance. We don't exterminate animals who we may no longer *need* anymore.
Therefor we need to eat them.
I'm going to eat you like a snack, kid.
Don't you dare touch the horses.
It tastes like beef
+
Its bio
like they are free and shit
Run around
eat grass
Is this ironic or not?
'Cause if it is unironic. That is kind of small brain of you.
Unironically preserve the horses but hey if you're hungry and can afford a horse...
We have bovines for a reason. Factory farming isn't some evil, it is the thing that preserves our huge population.
Same thing with genetically modified organisms.
Humanity molds nature to her benefit. There is no reason to begin acting ludicrous in that ''just because''.
So we dont need to eat horses.
Pretty much, yes.
Agreed.
If your issue is their connection to high culture.
Then we can go full socialist.
Collectivize the fields.
Not really.
Im National Communist.
The horses are for the people, not the capitalists.
Exactly.
I'd love to have a horse. But I'm broke as all hell.
I wouldn't be able to accommodate for it what-so-ever.
**mongolians lived in collectives and were communist pretty much and they had horses therefor horses ally of the proleteriat.**
Horses debunked.