https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lBqwjxIigY&t=82s watch America First with Nicholas J. Fuentes

fuckers with the rolled R and shit

> the redditor’s emphasis on black and labeling themself as a (person of color) is literally reverse jim crow.
You make such a bold claim and then back it up with nothing. How is it reverse jim crow? What does that even mean? You can't put out such a thing and then leave it at that. This feels like an emotional plea more than anything.
> the primary contradiction still stands. liberalism is quick and easy bandaids to much bigger problems.
This is true. This is why I brought up consumerism. Liberalism uses this as a means to get people to feel good fast. Remember the Gillette ads? Those are clearly aimed at liberal feminists to feel like they're doing something more than they really are.
> the BPP new this, and although routed themselves as black peoples, they acknowledged that the single most pressing issue is that of class and their relation to the MOP. By putting any issue above class, you’re engaging in liberalism as defined by Mao
The BPP who felt there was no place in socialism for black people? "The theory did not fit at all with the conditions and aspirations of Blacks. Thousands were moving to the North to get factory jobs, as the sharecropping system was dying out and Blacks were being forced off the land. There was simply no basis—in conditions or in the aspirations of Blacks themselves—for demanding a separate state in the Black Belt." The issue with communism is it focused too heavily on class.
> By putting any issue above class, you’re engaging in liberalism as defined by Mao, and therefor you’re a revisionist who seeks a temporary problem to a solution that effects all. Black people haven’t always been the only poor people and white peoples haven’t.
Once again, you're throwing around meaningless terms. I am not revising anything and I did not say blacks *are* poor or whites *are* rich. I said the identities stood for them.

I destroyed ben shapiro

With all of this said, you don't come off as very smart. Your knowledge of IdPol is lacking and not thought out. I suppose you'd be surprised to know I quite like Mao and am against revisionism of any kind. The one doing revisionism is you since you want to water down all these things and view stuff simply rather than how it is at it's more complex. Class is an identity whether you want to admit it is or not and to ignore more complex elements of socialism is just foolish. We've talked too much now so I am going to leave it here. @sun araw

lets get an f for terry

f

did you really just take the pkk meme and put a shitty swastika over it

Yes. Yes I did.

I wanted to make it more neutral since that one was too specific.

You know, Turkey v Rojava.

Maoism is lit.

@T. Raven thats kinda cringe

reddit style

Fallout is a game about how the idea of American Exceptionalism is a suicidal idea that's going to get us all killed.

Just saying.

being gay is a choice

Wow, this bait is low quality as hell.

not bait fella

its something you can control

Yes bait, fella.

so wait

partialy by your bringing up

I can learn to be gay?

Try harder.

@DA GOMMIE JOO nah it has to do with your upbringing

too late big guy

Why would you not want to be gay? You can get disowned by your family, denied a job, and hated by everyone.

sounds like an epigenetics thing then

imagine not wanting 5+ children

Okay.

I just did and it was awesome.