Message from @primarina

Discord ID: 633747997095755777


2019-10-15 19:22:33 UTC  

Arguably, the word can be taken to have the same meaning in both cases, and the differences explained with omission

2019-10-15 19:22:33 UTC  

We shouldn't worry about it

2019-10-15 19:23:07 UTC  

Non bias in a person's view, and being q real feature of reality isn't synonymous

2019-10-15 19:23:08 UTC  

The danger here is people are at greater risk of being mislead

2019-10-15 19:23:24 UTC  

Do you think people have an IQ of 2

2019-10-15 19:23:27 UTC  

My interpretation is likely the interpretation of the common man

2019-10-15 19:23:38 UTC  

I've never had anyone make that mistake before

2019-10-15 19:23:41 UTC  

You shouldn't use the intelligence of others as a crutch, rely on it when necessary

2019-10-15 19:23:55 UTC  

If someone doesn't know, they google intrinsic morality

2019-10-15 19:24:08 UTC  

Except, my version of the phrase is also valid

2019-10-15 19:24:20 UTC  

You clarfied what you meant, and I accepted that meaning

2019-10-15 19:24:35 UTC  

Sure, but that also means nothing at all in the context I used it, so to know more people will google it

2019-10-15 19:25:37 UTC  

Or they'd ask you for clarification

2019-10-15 19:25:45 UTC  

Because they don't assume you're without fault

2019-10-15 19:26:03 UTC  

Nor was I talking to you to begin with, why would your interpretation matter?

2019-10-15 19:26:05 UTC  

and / or possibly have a bad internet connection at the moment, ioi

2019-10-15 19:26:28 UTC  

Me and that person discuss this all the time, they knew what I'm talking about

2019-10-15 19:26:45 UTC  

You show up with zero context and assume you will have a good opinion

2019-10-15 19:27:48 UTC  

You clarified your point, I talked about I didn't read it that way, and how I took issue with the language

2019-10-15 19:27:56 UTC  

You then clarified that it was a term of art

2019-10-15 19:28:16 UTC  

And took issue when I tried to use the component words in other ways; morality intrinsic to the subject

2019-10-15 19:28:56 UTC  

I took issue because I already clarified the only use of the word, and you were trying to address *other* uses of it when that wasn't the argument

2019-10-15 19:29:21 UTC  

I wanted to address other uses because they were how I intended to make my point

2019-10-15 19:29:43 UTC  

Those points are immaterial to what was at hand

2019-10-15 19:29:59 UTC  

I believe there can be morality intrinsic to the subject, and I believe that language for describing them is permissible and proper.

2019-10-15 19:31:15 UTC  

Why is whether I can something the way I choose to say it immaterial?

2019-10-15 19:31:20 UTC  

That's just subjective morality, and has never been called "intrinsic", the argument is that existentialism necessitates subjectivism

2019-10-15 19:31:41 UTC  

Because that point right there is not relevant to the argument at hand

2019-10-15 19:32:30 UTC  

The point I wanted to make was primarily about intrinsic subjective morality and language usage solutions

2019-10-15 19:33:06 UTC  

Intrinsic subjective morality is distinct from non-intrinsic subjective morality

2019-10-15 19:33:22 UTC  

Like I said, irrelevant

2019-10-15 19:33:30 UTC  

To your end, not to mine.

2019-10-15 19:34:10 UTC  

If you want to start a separate debate then sure but I wanted Addie to respond

2019-10-15 19:34:36 UTC  

TBF, one goal of mine was to question why objective morality has value, and why objective morality is necessary to reject pedophillia

2019-10-15 19:38:07 UTC  

Well I gtg but I didn't claim that objective morality is necessary to reject pedophilia, I claimed there is nothing objectively wrong with it outside of societal norms set in place by people who were objective moralists if you are a subjective moralist.

2019-10-15 19:39:10 UTC  

Ah, I see the distinction "There is no *atheistic* argument against pedophilia because from a pure evolutionary perspective there is nothing wrong with it."

2019-10-15 19:39:30 UTC  

tbf that's pretty ambiguous to someone who hasn't read certain texts

2019-10-15 19:39:48 UTC  

Even if they wikipediad it or dictionaried it

2019-10-15 19:39:50 UTC  

I wasn't talking to those people

2019-10-15 19:40:10 UTC  

Yeah, but I'm one of those people and I read it

2019-10-15 19:40:27 UTC  

Okie, I'm out now though