Message from @☭ ⊕ Korovsky ⊕ ☭

Discord ID: 651880901239635994


2019-12-04 20:17:54 UTC  

has to logically exist outside of Time itself

2019-12-04 20:17:59 UTC  

since Time is also a factor that is in motion

2019-12-04 20:18:12 UTC  

@Spergerger not sure how he figured those things out

2019-12-04 20:18:12 UTC  

can you soundly demonstrate that at all?

2019-12-04 20:18:14 UTC  

but ok

2019-12-04 20:18:27 UTC  

via logic

2019-12-04 20:18:56 UTC  

so you now admit that this argumentation offers a logical proof for something we refer to as god?

2019-12-04 20:19:37 UTC  

no, if anything it just tells us that there is a first mover. And that is only, when i grant your premises

2019-12-04 20:19:58 UTC  

addie you have shown a lack of comprehension again

2019-12-04 20:20:02 UTC  

okay so what alternatives would there plausibly be?

2019-12-04 20:20:17 UTC  

if not a thing/being that exists outside of time

2019-12-04 20:20:28 UTC  

the characteristics necessary for a first mover are the characteristics of god

2019-12-04 20:20:29 UTC  

literally anything, so long as you claim it exists outside of time

2019-12-04 20:20:52 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/588205956039442452/651880624965025825/unknown.png

2019-12-04 20:20:54 UTC  

i could make up something right now with those characteristics lol. I also don't agree with a lot of them

2019-12-04 20:21:09 UTC  

what parts did you disagree with?

2019-12-04 20:21:12 UTC  

i thought we went through them

2019-12-04 20:21:17 UTC  

"cannot have any imperfections"

2019-12-04 20:21:23 UTC  

so God is perfectly nonexistant?

2019-12-04 20:21:25 UTC  

<:garfilf:606968189640769668>

2019-12-04 20:21:58 UTC  

no, which is where we go into the next point

2019-12-04 20:22:06 UTC  

Define perfect please

2019-12-04 20:22:12 UTC  

Cuz it’s pretty damn subjective

2019-12-04 20:22:12 UTC  

yes

2019-12-04 20:22:15 UTC  

what is "perfect"

2019-12-04 20:22:23 UTC  

perfectly evil?

2019-12-04 20:22:36 UTC  

imperfection is unrealised potentiality

2019-12-04 20:22:43 UTC  

or what about perfectly physical

2019-12-04 20:22:56 UTC  

i disagree

2019-12-04 20:23:10 UTC  

well perfect is defined as having all desired or required qualities, characteristics and elements - as good as it is possible to be

2019-12-04 20:23:50 UTC  

but i'm a bit puzzled here, you said you disagreed on a lot of things

2019-12-04 20:23:54 UTC  

which points in particular?

2019-12-04 20:23:55 UTC  

besides eight

2019-12-04 20:24:08 UTC  

Yea what things are desired?

2019-12-04 20:24:20 UTC  

Cuz many contradict each other

2019-12-04 20:24:21 UTC  

this smacks of some kind of omnipotence argument
''durr can god make a square circle''

2019-12-04 20:24:43 UTC  

You can’t be both flat and round for example

2019-12-04 20:24:55 UTC  

Or both calm and angry

2019-12-04 20:25:27 UTC  

it's a bit of a copout to try and disprove via laws that he created; you would have to conclude that somebody who is *outside* of these laws is not beholden to them

2019-12-04 20:25:37 UTC  

since he himself defines what they are

2019-12-04 20:25:50 UTC  

Nah I’m just tryna understand your definition of perfect