Marx wouldn't have seen the USSR as socialist

Probably would have

of

production

interventionism is abolishing the market forced

intervention is not owning means of production

Socialism isn’t just means of production owned by the state or workers

it also wants the market abolished

and also to secure the workers owning the MoP, the state must intervene.

its anything realted to state dealing with economic affairs of the state

It wants laisses faire economics gone....Market Socialism is a thing

If socialism is owning the mop, then regulation is not socialism if they don't own it

Yes it also wants to abolish the free market

Through state intervention

hence any intervention is socialist

Regulation is often done with the intent of making the market fairer. Be that an ineffective policy, it's not socialism even with this retarded definition @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ

Market interventions are not incompatible with capitalism
You do know Keynesian economics is a thing right?

Yes and it’s not capitalism

This guy thinks Pinochet was socialist

@The Big Oof nope

okay wait WHAT

Right

It reduced the market forced

I think I remember Sid. He's a retard.

@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ According to your retarded logic he was

So was Adam smith a capitalist?

woah woah

There’s too many people@here

Correct, and everyone thinks you're a retard

When the fuck did I say Pinochet was socialist LOL

I don’t even know enough about Pinochet

Dogpiling low-energy bints is capitalism.

Keynesian is not capitalist for starters

I don't even know enough about everything in the world*

Market intervention reduces the market forces and removes the free market

It is not capitalism and nor is it compatible

Keynesian economics is just taking place in a mixed economy

Which is not capitalist

@The Big Oof as you said market socialism requires the free market to abolished

This guy admitted he doesn't care about fallacies, and said historical context of socialism doesn't mean anything. We're wasting our time.

Through interventionism