Message from Dan iiii in Charlottesville 2.0 #news

2017-07-17 00:06:46 UTC  

We're "libertarians" that's what I told NBC when they interviewed me. @MadDimension

2017-07-17 00:06:47 UTC  

Nat Geo is maximum jew lol

2017-07-17 00:06:56 UTC  

Dont think you can represent anyone if you arent leadership

2017-07-17 00:07:05 UTC  

Your call though. I think publicity is always good tbh

2017-07-17 00:07:15 UTC  


2017-07-17 00:07:22 UTC  

Getting media coverage is better than being under a media blackout; the "paper curtain" as GLW called the Jewish media

2017-07-17 00:07:25 UTC  

Getting high quality video of our shit for free is always good

2017-07-17 00:07:34 UTC  

It's obviously gonna be a hit piece but fuck it. Accelerate or die

2017-07-17 00:07:36 UTC  

It's probably going to be hit piece, but you can't turn something like that down.

2017-07-17 00:07:39 UTC  

Cause we can just take that footage and repurpose it

2017-07-17 00:07:46 UTC  

Also, neither Donald Trump or Richard Spencer would be where they are today without doing media interviews

2017-07-17 00:07:52 UTC  

It doesn't matter WHICH mag/tv/radio the journo works for, they will ALWAYS spin whatever interview you give.

2017-07-17 00:07:56 UTC  

But seriously, I think @Eli Mosley has the info required for such an interview.

2017-07-17 00:08:01 UTC  

A written statement works.

2017-07-17 00:08:33 UTC  


2017-07-17 00:08:37 UTC  

No FUCK written statements. Publicity is for getting photos and video that's it

2017-07-17 00:08:38 UTC  

Not just a written statement, you also must get them to agree to publish it in whole. They cannot have permission to publish anything in parts.

2017-07-17 00:08:40 UTC  

Going to reaffirm my stance that these discussions are best had strictly among coordinators and leadership.

2017-07-17 00:09:21 UTC  

I like the idea of publishing interview in full

2017-07-17 00:09:23 UTC  

@MadDimension I would go the Anglin Route:
I'm a Neo-Nazi White Supremacist pro-Confederate Hitlerist, now what's you first question.

2017-07-17 00:10:30 UTC  

Sometimes one can ask for the questions beforehand so you know what will be asked and have answers prepared.

2017-07-17 00:10:44 UTC  

Best case.

2017-07-17 00:11:24 UTC  

Be sure to say "Paul Wooderson commands 50,000 white nationalists on to western Michigan area and they're all ex-cons who don't care about going back to jail"

2017-07-17 00:11:27 UTC  

When they interviewed me a few years ago they left out the League of the South from my interview and just said I was an electrician. They barely used any of my talking points.

2017-07-17 00:11:58 UTC  

I think my job as the organizer would be to frame the speeches as part of the 1st Amendment and part of a necessary movement for white people to organize for their own interests. That would be the talking points I hit again and again

2017-07-17 00:12:28 UTC  

Just get them to print "white genocide"

2017-07-17 00:12:47 UTC  

They will of course selectively edit speeches from August 12th to frame white advocacy in the scariest way possible but that's better than no coverage at all

2017-07-17 00:12:52 UTC  

@MadDimension they probably won't include any reasonable talking points.

2017-07-17 00:13:07 UTC  

@kristall.night Of course not

2017-07-17 00:13:53 UTC  

A written statement if agreed to be published in full would be closest to a fair shake. If they can't chop an interview up and edit it they just won't use it

2017-07-17 00:14:06 UTC  

The only good articles and videos of interviews by the MSM I've seen are the ones where /ourguys/ are blatantly trolling the journos

2017-07-17 00:14:23 UTC  

@wyatt I'm pretty much "the leadership" right now. Not hearing from anyone else. Oh well, it's gotten us this far

2017-07-17 00:14:35 UTC  

If you're being filmed/recorded, make sure to record it yourself too. Tape all phone calls so you can't be misquoted.

2017-07-17 00:15:13 UTC  

@MadDimension they'll probably overlay your statements with videos of the Klan or something

2017-07-17 00:15:36 UTC  

@Herrenvolk - MD link to that interview?

2017-07-17 00:15:51 UTC  

@kristall.night Good point. I need to get them to agree to some ground rules before going in

2017-07-17 00:16:02 UTC  

@kristall.night We have reasonable talking points?
What is this National Review?

2017-07-17 00:16:07 UTC  

@MadDimension assume hostility

2017-07-17 00:16:34 UTC  

yes. If you do anything, make them agree to 1: let you approve it before they're allowed to publish, and 2: they must publish in full. You'll know they're trying to fuck you over if they won't agree.

2017-07-17 00:17:21 UTC  

If you're gonna bother with "ground rules" just make sure you have them agreeing to the rules on tape so you can call them out for breaking those rules later.

2017-07-17 00:17:40 UTC  

@Tyrone All of our talking points are reasonable but can easily be put into context where they sound absurd