Could you clarify as to how you would have formed a response?

Sure.

The problem with it is that you are utilizing it as a label to excuse yourself from more critically viewing the responce.

Not everything has to be a head-to-head debate. If you want to, Ill be happy to oblige. I was simply making a vague and satirical comment in alignment to my opinion. My comment itself wasn’t an argument, I was just expressing my disagreement.

Disagreement on what?

On your response to the “dickhead”

What specifically?

What specifically did I say made you disagree with me?

Was it the individualist comments? The non-prejuduce comments? The fact I don't align with the label of "white"?

You make the #1 rookie mistake. You attack your enemy before understanding them. Your analysis of what you think the alt-right is, is laughable. I also disagree with your dismissal of race realism. And in general, your serious conduct against what was clearly a troll.

You're incorrect on that first assumtion. He blatantly stated his idelogy, he litterally spelled it out right there. And I know how thw alt-right thinks, this isn't my first rodeo with them. Also, you're conflating me not caring about a person's race as dismissal of race realism. No, I recognize the scientific studies behind it, I just don't give a shit about averages, I care about individuals. And I highly doubt this was a troll, because if it was a troll, it wasn't very funny. You can't just pass off controversial opinions as "trolls" anymore when it comes to the internet.

You clearly don’t know how the alt right thinks or you never would have presented them in such a way. So you realize the difference in race but not the implications of what that means for society? And it was clearly a troll. You don’t start off a legitimate argument with “You suck Jew dick. Does your mom know?” They were clearly doing it to provoke you and you gave them exactly what they wanted.

But the guy also says to join the "real alt-right" in the same statement?

I’m not saying he wasn’t alt right. He literally identified himself as being alt right.

I’m just saying that because you don’t have a realistic comprehension of the ideology of the alt right, you misinterpret their beliefs. Much like the left does of Kekistan.

Dude, I was responding to what he blatantly laid out for me in that comment.

But as I said, you completely misinterpret his “points”

How is there room for misinterpretation? It's quite obvious what he believes!

Yeah, it is obvious. You seem to have missed the meaning somehow.

How do you mean? What in my responce gave you this idea? I took what he said, and wrote a responce to it explaining the value of individualism over collectivism, and why no one should be judged soley on their race, rather their individual character.

Let me explain it like this, if you were to say Nigger, an ‘sjw’ could easily assume that you’re a racist, as Nigger is a racist term, and they could build an argument off of that. But you know, and I know, that you’re saying it satirically and don’t mean Nigger in a legitimately racist way.

Of course, but how does this relate to your point or his comment? I'm a bit lost on that part still.

*

++++++++++++++++

------------------------------

hi i have a cat

Neet

It’s the same basic concept. Being “outside of the alt right loop” so to speak, you’re misinterpreting their points as being something that they aren’t.

I’m not saying that there aren’t major flaws within the alt right ideology, but the way you’ve presented them, as being unintelligent racists, isn’t accurate.

You do realize I used to be alt-right myself right?

I don’t buy that. If you were, you’d understand their way of thinking.

I understand their way of thinking, I think you’re just shifting the goal post to encompass something which they are not.

If you understood their way of thinking, you wouldn’t label them as white supremacists.

Even when they use race realism as an argument as to why the white race has value over all other races and thus needs preserving? Riiiight....

Clearly you weren’t alt right. Race realism isn’t used as an argument for why whites are superior, its used as an argument for why whites aren’t compatible with other races, and why its natural for every race to strive to preserve themselves. They don’t believe their superior, but rather that each race has strengths and weaknesses.

Whites aren't compatible with other races? So if I stick my dick in a brown girl, I don't have to worry about child-support? Come the fuck on dude. That's conflating culture with race. I don't profess I'm smarter than every Mexican, in fact, I have no problem admitting there are probably thouands of Mexicans who are smarter than I am, but I also have no problem admitting that there are some who are not. We're all one species at the end of the day, but beyod that, we are individuals.

Also, if those within the alt-right didn't have a superiority complex, then why preserve the white race? It's not the smartest, nor the fastest, nor the strongest, nor anything really. They are pretty much just average, no reason to preserve them if they don't excell anywhere.

uh well, i dont know if this has to do with anything but uh hey im hispanic, and a dumbass but i can make lines on paper be an actual creative work and i can sorta write so its enough for me??? haha

sorry its been on my mind this whole time

Intelligence takes many different forms. I'd say you're more creatively intelligent.

i guess?? haha

I hate any human that causes deforestation and makes species go extinct