Message from Deleted User 936b42a6 in Messiah of Kek's Promised Land #general_autism
I have a problem with not using easiest solutions when given.
Why though? Did I break a rule?
Are we not allowed to have opposing opinions?
That’s not the spirit of Kekistan
It’s shameful, actually. Never in my time served as a KSSC have I ever seen such triggered behavior from a Kekistani.
I’m just tired of dealing with collectivism and your cancerous ideology. It’s spread everywhere now, and I don’t need it in my server of all places.
My ideology? I never stated my ideology.
It’s pretty fucking clear you’re alt-right
I never identified myself with that label. Who are you to decide what I am for me?
I’m just saying, you’re a shady character who has already said some shady shit.
I believe he's referring to your "That's a massive fucking blue-pill" response.
Exactly. Ideological indifference is not an exclusively leftist position, it’s also very much so a centralist position. (More so than a leftists’)
So, what? I think your response was poorly formed. Am I not allowed to comment on it?
That's not what you said though. You simply labeled it a "blue-pilled" responce, and then left it at that.
And what’s wrong with that?
That isn’t a term exclusive to the alt-right
Could you clarify as to how you would have formed a response?
The problem with it is that you are utilizing it as a label to excuse yourself from more critically viewing the responce.
Not everything has to be a head-to-head debate. If you want to, Ill be happy to oblige. I was simply making a vague and satirical comment in alignment to my opinion. My comment itself wasn’t an argument, I was just expressing my disagreement.
Disagreement on what?
On your response to the “dickhead”
What specifically did I say made you disagree with me?
Was it the individualist comments? The non-prejuduce comments? The fact I don't align with the label of "white"?
You make the #1 rookie mistake. You attack your enemy before understanding them. Your analysis of what you think the alt-right is, is laughable. I also disagree with your dismissal of race realism. And in general, your serious conduct against what was clearly a troll.
You're incorrect on that first assumtion. He blatantly stated his idelogy, he litterally spelled it out right there. And I know how thw alt-right thinks, this isn't my first rodeo with them. Also, you're conflating me not caring about a person's race as dismissal of race realism. No, I recognize the scientific studies behind it, I just don't give a shit about averages, I care about individuals. And I highly doubt this was a troll, because if it was a troll, it wasn't very funny. You can't just pass off controversial opinions as "trolls" anymore when it comes to the internet.
You clearly don’t know how the alt right thinks or you never would have presented them in such a way. So you realize the difference in race but not the implications of what that means for society? And it was clearly a troll. You don’t start off a legitimate argument with “You suck Jew dick. Does your mom know?” They were clearly doing it to provoke you and you gave them exactly what they wanted.
But the guy also says to join the "real alt-right" in the same statement?
I’m not saying he wasn’t alt right. He literally identified himself as being alt right.
I’m just saying that because you don’t have a realistic comprehension of the ideology of the alt right, you misinterpret their beliefs. Much like the left does of Kekistan.
Dude, I was responding to what he blatantly laid out for me in that comment.
But as I said, you completely misinterpret his “points”
How is there room for misinterpretation? It's quite obvious what he believes!
Yeah, it is obvious. You seem to have missed the meaning somehow.
How do you mean? What in my responce gave you this idea? I took what he said, and wrote a responce to it explaining the value of individualism over collectivism, and why no one should be judged soley on their race, rather their individual character.
Let me explain it like this, if you were to say Nigger, an ‘sjw’ could easily assume that you’re a racist, as Nigger is a racist term, and they could build an argument off of that. But you know, and I know, that you’re saying it satirically and don’t mean Nigger in a legitimately racist way.
Of course, but how does this relate to your point or his comment? I'm a bit lost on that part still.