this is uncomfortably millenial

im out

Go Fuck Yourself, arquiusGuy ! You Cunt.

its the winter olympics

so i guess

I don't think those count.

*shrugs*

🤷🏿

i don't really follow anything other then a couple of shows and even then i tend to drop things fast, so all i know is that the winter olympics this year is in north Korea and its the winter olympics

and it ends on the 25th, just remembered

You sure it's not in South Korea?

Because North Korea is the bad one.

nope, north korea

That's... um...

huh

well we haven't died yet

Has anyone gone "missing" yet?

Not to my knowledge, no.

>not instantly recognizing the greatest congressional candidate to ever walk the face of the earth @Trini Dayana Rivera

>Not recognizing the least electable politician ever.

Exactly

No dear, that’s not a compliment.

Depends on your perspective

I’d argue that honesty and a genuine passion for serving your people is more important than “electability”, which is really only obtained through false promises and adopting popular opinions

And also evidently being really, really petty.

How so?

Watch the most recent Kekcast.

Okay, first of all, it’s not pronounced “Nee-hell-en” with a golf ball down your throat. Nor is it pronounced “Nellen”. It’s “Nee-lynn”. Plain and simple.

I totally understand how dyslexia (I’m assuming that’s why you switch around words and numbers so frequently when you’re reading, don’t confuse this for mockery, just an observation) can make things like that difficult, but if you'd actually listened to podcasts, articles, etc, about him before you went ahead and discussed him, you’d know.

Also, with as many personal attacks as Nehlen receives on a daily basis, conglomerating around 70 really doesn’t require that much effort and what’s ironic is that many of these people claiming not be Jews after Nehlen has listed them as being Jews, had previously tweeted or claimed themselves to be Jews. And I don’t really see how it’s “petty”, because it actually proves an interesting point, whether or not it’s one you agree with.

Overall, your commentary was weak, and I think what’s most fascinating is that, of all the news you could have covered regarding Paul Nehlen (the number of controversies are ever growing), you chose to talk about a small list he made a while back, when he hadn’t been banned from twitter. It’s such a minor issue in comparison to everything that’s happened since then, but I doubt you knew that, because if you actually did independent research instead of letting an article decide your beliefs for you, you would know about the Cheddar Man controversy and the Twitter Shoah controversy, and the Paul Nehlen twitter protests and you would have covered them.

Alright, I deal with a lot of shit, but being called dyslexic and having my intelligence belittled by the likes of you? Not happening.

Did you not read what I said

I feel like you didn’t read what I said

I read what you said, and all I read was “I have a raging hard-on for Paul Nellen, therefore, you’re wrong about him being a petty piece-of-shit anti-Semite.”

Okay, but it sounds like you just skimmed my argument rather than actually considering it

That's because it was a stupid apologist's argument. You're trying to excuse bad behavior with "Oh you choose THIS to commentate on?!? How unprofessional of you!"

No...that’s not what I was saying at all.

That is exactly what you said!

Now you're going to try and back-track on that and cry "misrepresentation!"

Go Fuck Yourself, Alt-sup ! You Cunt.