Message from @Veritas

Discord ID: 640272486851674124


2019-11-02 19:30:10 UTC  

Fascist = nazi = far-right = white nationalist = white supremacist = nationalist = nativist = racist = sexist

2019-11-02 19:30:12 UTC  

Etc.

2019-11-02 19:30:17 UTC  

You get the idea

2019-11-02 19:30:26 UTC  

According to NPCs anyway

2019-11-02 19:32:00 UTC  

.

2019-11-02 19:32:09 UTC  

Xenophobe homophobe etc.

2019-11-02 19:32:09 UTC  

Are there any Muslims in this server

2019-11-02 19:32:21 UTC  

Might be @Veritas

2019-11-02 19:32:21 UTC  

@anthr0pos I prefer the term bigot

2019-11-02 19:32:30 UTC  

I'm not scared of fags

2019-11-02 19:32:33 UTC  

I just hate them

2019-11-02 19:32:45 UTC  

.

2019-11-02 19:32:47 UTC  

But yh

2019-11-02 19:32:52 UTC  

Id happily be called a bigot

2019-11-02 19:32:56 UTC  

Not sure between the active members, can't think of any Muslim here rn

2019-11-02 19:32:57 UTC  

Because I am a bigot

2019-11-02 19:33:05 UTC  

But I refuse to be called a homophobe

2019-11-02 19:33:12 UTC  

Because I'm not scared of gays

2019-11-02 19:34:00 UTC  

Also

2019-11-02 19:34:08 UTC  

If you do ever meet a muslim

2019-11-02 19:34:16 UTC  

Show them this wall of text

2019-11-02 19:34:20 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/604498877231529985/640272505453543447/1.png

2019-11-02 19:34:23 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/604498877231529985/640272516077715486/2.png

2019-11-02 19:34:26 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/604498877231529985/640272527826092033/3.png

2019-11-02 19:34:28 UTC  

.

2019-11-02 19:34:35 UTC  

They are numbered for your convenience

2019-11-02 19:34:41 UTC  
2019-11-02 19:36:19 UTC  

Ah

2019-11-02 19:36:23 UTC  

Interesting

2019-11-02 19:36:57 UTC  

could we get a text version thats uhh easier to use

2019-11-02 19:37:51 UTC  

No @Sav

2019-11-02 19:37:56 UTC  

You can have this instead

2019-11-02 19:37:57 UTC  

.

2019-11-02 19:38:01 UTC  

Surah 18: 83 - 86:
Dhul-Qarnain (Allegedly Alexander the Great.) found the setting place of the sun, which set in a spring of “black, muddy (or hot) water” and he found it near a people.

This implies we can reach the setting place of the sun, because Dhul-Qarnain reached it. The counter argument to this is it looked as if it were setting, not that it actually was. However, the Quran doesn’t talk as if it were from Dhul-Qarnain’s perspective, but rather objectively. At no point is it ever written from Dhul-Qarnain’s perspective. It never says “as if.”

It’s clear the writer of the Quran didn’t know the world was round. Muhammad lived near the sea, and he saw the sun set in the west, and that’s all he knew. So when he wrote about Dhul-Qarnain, he wrote that he was so mighty that he reached the place where the sun sets, and rises.

Book of recitations: 4002:
It was narrated that Abu Dharr said: “I was riding behind the Messenger of Allah while he was on a donkey, and the sun was setting. He said: “Do you know where this (sun) sets? I said: “Allah and his messengers know best.” He said: “It sets in a spring of warm water.”

- Dhul-Qarnain isn’t mentioned. This isn’t a story of someone travelling anywhere, it’s Muhammad asking a follower of his if he knows where the sun sets, and his follower replying with “I don’t know” and then Muhammad saying it sets in a body of warm water. It never says “It appears as if” or “it seems to”

- It is graded as “sahih” or “authentic”, yet Muslim apologists claim it isn’t reliable, because it is just one account. An alternative hadith is often used, where a “resting place” is mentioned, however we know that the sun doesn’t have a “resting place” as the Earth rotates around the sun continuously.

2019-11-02 19:38:37 UTC  

Ok thanks

2019-11-02 19:46:00 UTC  

imagine not bleaching italians whenever you can

2019-11-02 19:46:04 UTC  
2019-11-02 19:46:51 UTC  

Serbs can't bleach though because they're black

2019-11-02 19:47:14 UTC  

but this ^

2019-11-02 19:47:15 UTC  

<:hitlerpepe:543956279056400396>

2019-11-02 19:47:39 UTC  

<:yes:632180248833949706>