Message from @Falco
Discord ID: 642190639207022595
Fuck cooperation that teacher is a dumb bitching lying to the youth
I understand not speaking up but Godspeed to the femoid
To be fair, I could see sealioning as a legit concept. If you're a dick for so long and then pretend to be nice just to troll people, I wouldn't expect them to take you seriously and so you'd have to work extra hard to convince them you're acting in good faith.
The problem lies in painting someone as a sealion when they HAVEN'T been a dick to you.
After the class watched some video about how the hijab is a choice, we all had to write if our opinion on the topic changed.
In this particular case she’s supposed to educate kids but she lied to them
That’s a big no no and it breaks the social contract between teacher and student
This is what happened to Sargon at VidCon, and even though he went in good faith, it wasn't reasonable for Anita to expect that he was, given his dickishness to her in the past
Also what happened to Crowder with Cenk
he said something about passing TYT in subs, and so he isnt going to be punching down on them
because until recently it was punching up
Punching up / down is a form of suprematism
not sure if you mean something else
it assumes inequality
When you want to have a civil discussion with someone, but they decide to smear you instead. <:comfort:592107824826417204>
If two people are equal, they should be able to criticize each other as peers. Saying one side can't hit the other is an acknowledgement of their inferiority. So like not criticizing PoC is a form of white supremacy and the soft bigotry of low expectations
Affirmative Action is the soft bigotry of low expectations. It assumes I can't succeed in life without the help of the government.
correct
so are reparations
although that's more complicated
I've always wanted to ask someone who agrees with the idea of reparations how the one-drop rule comes into play.
In general, at least the way it's currently sold, social justice is a form of white supremacy and feminism is a form of patriarchy. Because without a differential between groups, you'd have no need for either.
That isn't to say everything is perfect and there aren't still problems, but in general, if you're someone who already sees people as being equal, you don't need feminism or social justice.
The left cannot defend their claims. Even when they disagree, they cannot acknowledge the gravity of "not true leftists" acting harmfully.
So, in a cynical sense, IntFems and SJWs need there to be a problem to stay relevant
Take for example, when I brought this one up on a left-of-center Discord: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fTYz50MLMM
The reaction was:
It would be funny if some emails from intersectional feminists came out saying the need to use the pied piper strategy to make men the boogey man.
You have university professors calling out **ON TAPE** for extermination of whites, and
A) I need to come out of rabbit hole for bringing it up
B) it's only a problem in top universities
C) Orange Man Bad
the tax cuts are bad
Regarding the tax cuts, you can just use this next time:
because the richer people saved more money than the poorer people
huh???
I don't care to explain the tax cuts because the entire topic is **DERAILMENT**.
Wouldn’t it be WORSE if it’s TOP UNIVERSITIES?!
TAX CUTS BAD CUZ PEOPLE I DONT LIKE GOT MORE OUT OF IT REEEEEEEEEE
I don't need to explain why bringing up tax cuts is wrong.
Often, it's not what you say, it's how you say it
It's another topic.
I have actually walked back leftists many times, just through proper pacing
“Yeah, only the most elite and highest ranking colleges in society call of the genocide of whites, so shut up bigot!”
also how is 'its only a problem in top universities' make it better?