So at least I wouldn't *not* recommend putting yourself out there, after all you don't have much to risk.
I'm only saying it's easy for you.

Other people don't have that privilege of being lone wolves or having low financial risk

It's not that uncommon. Look I can give you an example. I got celled here for posting a meme that was considered 'NSFW'. My *boss* thought it was funny and likely the *owner of the company* would have laughed at it. Because outside of academia very few people consider these things to be serious offenses. We are too busy making things that work.

Celled here

Is that your idea of serious consequences?

Do you understand that people like Harris and Peterson have *existential fears* ?

Posting rights or whatever on discord is child's play

How do you even compare that, it's ridiculous

Like playing with plastic swords in the backyard and calling it real war

Peterson and Harris have existential fears because their careers are based in membership in a culture that is censorious. I don't. Most people don't. Most people live in a world where **nobody** reads the NY Times.

That is precisely my point, how did you not get this

I was talking about people losing opportunities in their own respective fields

What do you have to lose compared to them, nothing

And I was talking about the narrow feild of perspectives people like Harris are exposed to.

I explained that the people who are actually capable of standing up to Harris have too much riding on it

It makes no sense for them to challenge him, it's a net negative risk-reward scenario

So those who do "challenge" him tend to agree with him

This is why echo chambers happen

Among other reasons, but it's the number one reason

The echo chamber happens because of selection bias. When you only speak to people within a narrow demographic.....

Echo chambers happen because it's economically sound to build them, and therefore also emotionally

If you're not in an echo chamber your risk goes up, but your reward does not go up proportionally

In fact the reward can actually go down

It's a stupid idea to be outside of an echo chamber unless you've built yourself a safety net

It is not a safety net. It is living in a world where they are not necessary.

Semantics, that's basically the same thing as a safety net

If you're not in an echo chamber but you can criticize your peers, then you must be safe from them or else you couldn't voice your concerns

It would also mean no one else is listening in who can harm you

Or those you care about

To think otherwise is to be of the naive mindset that the world is a safe place

It's quite the opposite, people are very antagonistic towards dissenters

You do not understand. In my world these people are not dissenters. They are normal. The staff at the Times are abnormal aliens.

I don't see your point

It's not about what you think they are

It's about what other people think they are

The lynchmob doesn't care what is right and wrong

They care that they get their sacrifice

Yes other people. Normal people, do not care much about that lynch mob.

The lynch mob doesn't care if they care

They lynch away anyway

Your argument is just so bad, when the evidence screams so loud