socially **and** economically?

yes, I'm fairly certain. Though I will fully admit to paying far more attention to social issues than economic ones

they want to repeal C-16. That's enough to get my vote

C-16 is the thing that makes it illegal to misgender someone

Thing is in Canada letting other ppl do what they want is not allowed by progressives and if you think the provinces should have larger say over their area than feds (republicanism in its true form) then you’ll be classed as far right

Also check out the 3D image of the survey it then does analysis of your centralization to decentralization but I think it’s wrong b.c NDP and greens are decentralized and I was put very centralized even though I basically don’t want any welfare and taxes other than immigration and military spending

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4aDqtHsEDw&fbclid=IwAR1KrXt29UuK-U8MT9EtRoO6aJ37WBe6aYlOVYzBnApfwyDAPj9XIc2WK-E&app=desktop

LMFAO

oh your fucking joking

that cannot be real

It has to be alarmist doctoring

looks like canadas age of consent for heterosexual intercourse is 16, and for anal sex it's 18

it's not as if a homosexual relationship is required for anal sex... that's just how the article puts it

anyway, given that... i think it's real.

Likely is. its more taking a weird bit of Canadian law and making it fit with the rest. I hate the guy personally, but aim the attacks at things he actually does wrong as opposed to moral puritanism. If he was dropping it below the general age of consent I would be more worried (say 14 or 12).

when did this channel come back?

@Bastard Ferret the age of consent in canada depends, 15-17 can sleep with people 5 years older than them, then 18 are adults

We were just invisible due to our close proximity to the US-POL server.

ok

@flikersprigs well, as i said. i was quoting the article. generally what they said looked plausible, and was consistent with what i had heard. many places have "romeo and juliet" clauses. that's not unique to ca, i don't think

Well from what I remember of the law, it doesn't exclude anal sex

read the entire canadian criminal code, have you? there's always one...

here...

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/page-35.html?txthl=consent+age#s-159

...
Anal intercourse

159 (1) Every person who engages in an act of anal intercourse is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Exception

(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to any act engaged in, in private, between

(a) husband and wife, or

(b) any two persons, each of whom is eighteen years of age or more,

both of whom consent to the act.

@flikersprigs don't LARP as a lawywer, especially if you don't know what you're talking about.
if you really *are* a laywer. well... yikes.

I'm not

I've read the law regarding age of consent

>Talking about age of consent
>Anime profile picture
>Here we go again

and I don't recall it differentiating between regular sex and anal sex

kek.

it's cool, man. but the anal sex details weren't contained in that particular section of the code

ok

it was somewhere else. the video edit might still be dishonest. but anal sex consent is defintely defined as 18 for non married persons

but given what i know about justin "peoplekind" trudaeu, it's plausible. that's all i'm sayin' 🙂

honestly I wouldn't be surprised if we're both correct and the law just contradicts itself

actually I'd be willing to bet that's the case

i'll be honest, i *am* surprised that canada has a sodomy law

well, you were correct that the age of consent law does not mention anal sex

wait.. no