Message from @Bastard Ferret
Discord ID: 623538862701936650
Yeah, that's true
of course, this is ignoring PPC, which wasn't a part of it
>only the CPC is remotely conservative
and even that's a stretch
they're more "liberal lite"
>when your parties are so cucked that most of them are just progressive
I'll take Sheer over any of the other cucks, but if I could have my way, I'd put the PPC in charge
they are quite literally the *only* conservative party
socially **and** economically?
yes, I'm fairly certain. Though I will fully admit to paying far more attention to social issues than economic ones
they want to repeal C-16. That's enough to get my vote
C-16 is the thing that makes it illegal to misgender someone
Thing is in Canada letting other ppl do what they want is not allowed by progressives and if you think the provinces should have larger say over their area than feds (republicanism in its true form) then you’ll be classed as far right
Also check out the 3D image of the survey it then does analysis of your centralization to decentralization but I think it’s wrong b.c NDP and greens are decentralized and I was put very centralized even though I basically don’t want any welfare and taxes other than immigration and military spending
LMFAO
oh your fucking joking
that cannot be real
It has to be alarmist doctoring
looks like canadas age of consent for heterosexual intercourse is 16, and for anal sex it's 18
it's not as if a homosexual relationship is required for anal sex... that's just how the article puts it
anyway, given that... i think it's real.
Likely is. its more taking a weird bit of Canadian law and making it fit with the rest. I hate the guy personally, but aim the attacks at things he actually does wrong as opposed to moral puritanism. If he was dropping it below the general age of consent I would be more worried (say 14 or 12).
when did this channel come back?
@Bastard Ferret the age of consent in canada depends, 15-17 can sleep with people 5 years older than them, then 18 are adults
We were just invisible due to our close proximity to the US-POL server.
ok
@flikersprigs well, as i said. i was quoting the article. generally what they said looked plausible, and was consistent with what i had heard. many places have "romeo and juliet" clauses. that's not unique to ca, i don't think
Well from what I remember of the law, it doesn't exclude anal sex
read the entire canadian criminal code, have you? there's always one...
here...
...
Anal intercourse
159 (1) Every person who engages in an act of anal intercourse is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
Exception
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to any act engaged in, in private, between
(a) husband and wife, or
(b) any two persons, each of whom is eighteen years of age or more,
both of whom consent to the act.
@flikersprigs don't LARP as a lawywer, especially if you don't know what you're talking about.
if you really *are* a laywer. well... yikes.
I'm not
I've read the law regarding age of consent
>Talking about age of consent
>Anime profile picture
>Here we go again
and I don't recall it differentiating between regular sex and anal sex
kek.
it's cool, man. but the anal sex details weren't contained in that particular section of the code