Message from @Jack of Trades

Discord ID: 598937520440606778


2019-07-11 17:56:49 UTC  

That

2019-07-11 17:57:00 UTC  

child molesters have feelings too

2019-07-11 17:57:04 UTC  

poor dears

2019-07-11 17:57:05 UTC  

I thought he got convicted

2019-07-11 17:57:10 UTC  

Nope

2019-07-11 17:57:21 UTC  

Wasn't that the news yesterday?

2019-07-11 17:57:27 UTC  

They failed to convict him on contempt of court and now have new charges

2019-07-11 17:57:40 UTC  

He huwt the feeewings of chiwd mowestews

2019-07-11 17:58:08 UTC  

I thought he was being sentenced. What's he being sentenced for it not convicted?

2019-07-11 17:58:13 UTC  

Maybe they convicted them on that psychological trauma thing, IDK

2019-07-11 17:58:27 UTC  

Which would be funny as hekk

2019-07-11 17:58:44 UTC  

He was convicted on the contempt last i saw

2019-07-11 17:58:48 UTC  

He was found guilty of contempt of court

2019-07-11 17:58:49 UTC  

A child molester is higher on the progressive stack in UK than a reporter

2019-07-11 17:58:53 UTC  

I dont see any news against that

2019-07-11 17:58:56 UTC  

@Uksio you're wrong friend

2019-07-11 17:59:17 UTC  

Weird

2019-07-11 18:01:31 UTC  

What if someone is a pedo **and** a journalist? <:thinking_clown:590855640268668928>

2019-07-11 18:01:54 UTC  

Pedornalist, in short.

2019-07-11 18:03:38 UTC  
2019-07-11 18:03:52 UTC  

@retxirT every journalist

2019-07-11 18:07:51 UTC  

Honestly though like

2019-07-11 18:07:54 UTC  

Tommy, we get it

2019-07-11 18:07:56 UTC  

but you a dumbass

2019-07-11 18:08:04 UTC  

Wait.. so he mighta (psychologically) hurt a group of people that have, individually, performed what's generally considered a monstrous act?

2019-07-11 18:09:01 UTC  

The contempt thing is understandable.. but.. look.. we're talking about a series of individuals that have given up their rights by violating *children*.

2019-07-11 18:11:33 UTC  

I'm just trying to get my head around that one.

2019-07-11 18:13:13 UTC  

(Things about the entire "inalienable rights" concept is that, whilst they are inherent they can be relinquished by violating other's rights.)

2019-07-11 18:13:45 UTC  

Of course, my lense is singularly US.. so..

2019-07-11 18:14:49 UTC  

@King Canuck let's say he is. His anger and actions were righteous. This is unjust

2019-07-11 18:15:07 UTC  

@Laucivol how is it understandable?

2019-07-11 18:17:29 UTC  

@Jack of Trades oh I think his anger is just, his actions you can argue, but he doesn't deserve what he's been getting

2019-07-11 18:17:32 UTC  

can we agree there?

2019-07-11 18:18:12 UTC  

Of course

2019-07-11 18:18:26 UTC  

I don't care if he's dumb, he's right

2019-07-11 18:18:42 UTC  

Matter of concept- I don't know the details of the case.. just that the idea of contempt of court is reasonable.

2019-07-11 18:18:46 UTC  

He's doing all he knows how and he's being unjustly treated and it sickens me

2019-07-11 18:19:01 UTC  

@Laucivol In this case I don't agree

2019-07-11 18:19:34 UTC  

Again, was aiming at the idea, not that if he was or was not is correct or incorrect.

2019-07-11 18:20:14 UTC  

@Laucivol don't care