Message from @ETBrooD

Discord ID: 600394658862071823


2019-07-14 23:02:45 UTC  

I think the name of terrorist implies the definition

2019-07-14 23:03:32 UTC  

AntiFa is simply a terrorist group because they admit to using fear as a tactic

2019-07-14 23:04:02 UTC  

They intend to give terror and fear to drive of their opponents they deem "fascists."

2019-07-15 00:26:18 UTC  

@Coolitic the problem is govt uses it as an excuse to tack on extra charges... you commit any kind of felony, next thing you know, you're a terrorist

2019-07-15 00:26:36 UTC  

that doesn't change the definition of a terrorist

2019-07-15 00:26:45 UTC  

who created the definition?

2019-07-15 00:27:07 UTC  

whats wrong with just calling lone wolves, commiters of massacre?

2019-07-15 00:27:28 UTC  

they are, they're also terrorists

2019-07-15 00:27:46 UTC  

the solution is to prevent govts from using the label of terrorist to remove your rights

2019-07-15 00:27:57 UTC  

i dont see why we need to expand the definition of terrorist - it's authoritarian, it's using language for authoritarian ends, therefore orwellian

2019-07-15 00:28:14 UTC  

that is the default definition of terrorist, it's in the fucking name retard

2019-07-15 00:28:27 UTC  

i think the way to prevent govt removing rights is to more strictly and rigidly define the definition of terrorist

2019-07-15 00:28:52 UTC  

instead of actually telling the govt that they dont get to use that label as an excuse to remove your rights, you have the retarded idea of changing the definition?

2019-07-15 00:29:00 UTC  

someone who makes people feel scared shouldn't be it... it's too vague

2019-07-15 00:29:39 UTC  

hey i never said that shouldn't be done... the label shouldn't be used to remove rights either - but I think definitions are important, for legal reasons as well

2019-07-15 03:08:29 UTC  

I win!

2019-07-15 06:58:55 UTC  

@What Would Jack Conte Do? , I know that certain denominations of Christianity are apocalyptic. So, they can behave in a cult like manner over the misfortune of others. As it says so on the Bible. So, there are too many reasons why, this question , @What Would Jack Conte Do? but, they're not lone wolf, but, they took a little piece of what was said out of context and like any other opportunity of their belief; took it upon themselves. Like the guy from the Christchurch shootings. He travelled around the bad location's. How do we know, he's not apart of a cult?

2019-07-15 07:04:08 UTC  

And by the way @What Would Jack Conte Do? Britain and Europe removed their enemy of the country law's, because, of Europe. It is time to ask yourself whether or not they think treason law's are more effective, perhaps.

I don't think it stopped the IRA much but it reduced the other problems. Treason law's . Gave the country back it's fundamental right to make that decision.
By the way the new terrorist law's are an excuse for extra mistrust and extra insecurities because they can randomly pick on someone the government deems , as a terrorist. They may not necessarily be one. But then through the interrogation they may.

2019-07-15 18:13:42 UTC  

The definition of a terrorist is not necessary for law enforcement purposes

2019-07-15 18:33:23 UTC  

In recent years I've seen people citing Norway as an example of functioning democratic socialism. Well, I always doubted their claim, and my go-to response was that it's anecdotal evidence at best (selection bias). But perhaps pointing out Norway's natural resources makes for a stronger rebuttal:
https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/07/08/the-myth-of-democratic-socialism/

2019-07-15 18:34:01 UTC  

Plus, the lack of a connection between increasing socialism and wealth.

2019-07-15 18:36:45 UTC  

By the way it's the same with Austria. We're rich on natural resources.

2019-07-15 18:37:42 UTC  

I'd argue our high taxation is probably detrimental, but we don't notice the effects of that because we have all this natural wealth.

2019-07-15 23:48:59 UTC  

The more utopian your society already is, the larger amounts of socialism it can handle.

2019-07-16 06:21:09 UTC  

You're meant to cap it. Sorry, but, unless you have people working. Then they can't have the money. Simple as that. They have given away load's to refugees. But , then they kick them out the country. <:sargonfingerguns:568463117856669696> <:sargonmagaicon2:538676372726349824>

2019-07-16 15:45:08 UTC  

when will sargon leave UK forever? to what level will the tyranny increase before he does

2019-07-16 16:23:44 UTC  

never

2019-07-16 16:24:02 UTC  

he'll lead the revolution

2019-07-16 21:33:00 UTC  

Sargon will become the next Oliver Cromwell

2019-07-17 00:40:33 UTC  

If my memory of history is correct, things didn’t exactly end well for Cromwell, so I hope not.

2019-07-17 01:32:51 UTC  

Indeed. Fuck cromwell.

2019-07-17 03:29:12 UTC  

Question for everyone. If AOC is the horsewoman of famine, who would deserve the remaining titles from the rest of "The Squad"?

2019-07-17 03:30:04 UTC  

talib maybe war, idk the others though

2019-07-17 03:35:55 UTC  

Found a comment on the video that gives a good breakdown.
Omar is death for her stance towards terrorists and martyrs
Talib is war for her stance on Palestine and Hamas
Ayanna is famine because of black farmers (I'll admit I dont know enough about her to understand this reason)
And AOC is pestilence because shes and socialism is just cancer

2019-07-17 03:51:25 UTC  

whoreswoman**

2019-07-17 05:42:40 UTC  

@What Would Jack Conte Do?, I think he is one of many whom probably should seek political asylum.

Especially, since the media are making people subscribe to them , in order for us to read an informative piece of news. (Example below).

I think my biggest concern are those whom are silent. The silent majority whom are voting. Will perhaps be in danger, don't you think?

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/isis-attacks-uk-plot-farhad-salah-syria-prevent-threat-a9005886.html

2019-07-17 07:14:58 UTC  

The weird thing about that article if that the Independent is 1 step away from saying: Therefore the only solution is to let them fight abroad or kill them here now - but they haven't quite realized it.

2019-07-17 10:44:59 UTC  

@Comando I am actually relieved, I am not the only one whom, see's this all; bubble wrap ingestion of information; unfolding into another; ethical battle of tireless efforts vs logical reasoning, critical debate. All to which, most people , have been ingesting another, frequency. Some of which, they are too sensitive to call a spade a spade.

They have to put an intellectual spin on the failure's of their "open border's", theory. They have to admit there is evil in the world. Before they reach their consolidated conflicting conclusion.

Do people, feel, the looks that normal immigrants are recieving is uncomfortable ?

Is there a difference in the actions of these people?

I mean, these questions are now at the height of people's discussions in private . Which should have been public , to raise awareness and protect people.

Now what are your thoughts on this being: more vulnerable lives are going to be lost as a result of their benevolence?

2019-07-17 10:46:27 UTC  

I mean if you can call it benevolence. I like to address it that way because they've put the whole NGO'S into the picture. Then they dressed it up as such. What are your thoughts and theories?

2019-07-17 11:12:12 UTC  

Did they ever find Cromwell's head?

2019-07-17 11:12:28 UTC  

And tbh it went well for him for a while