Message from @ETBrooD

Discord ID: 599110122299588608


2019-07-12 05:26:42 UTC  

If you have a car, and 100 people own it, try to use the car.

2019-07-12 05:26:48 UTC  

I think you're misunderstanding the meaning of socialism

2019-07-12 05:27:06 UTC  

there are cooperative businesses with literally millions of employees

2019-07-12 05:27:12 UTC  

that's a lot more than 3 or 4

2019-07-12 05:27:32 UTC  

Socialism is supposed to plug all the holes basically so no one has to suffer, that's the theory at least

2019-07-12 05:27:37 UTC  

It's not supposed to make everyone equal

2019-07-12 05:27:41 UTC  

So do they pay a fee when they join the company to buy part of it

2019-07-12 05:28:27 UTC  

How the fuck does everyone owning everything in the entire company work
Someone bought the equipment.

2019-07-12 05:28:35 UTC  

someone handles the money and signs paychecks

2019-07-12 05:28:41 UTC  

It doesn't need to be owned by everyone, how often do I have to explain that

2019-07-12 05:28:51 UTC  

Socialism doesn't say anything about equality

2019-07-12 05:28:52 UTC  

Then who is the 'collective'

2019-07-12 05:29:00 UTC  

yeah usually the owners vote on the managerial staff

2019-07-12 05:29:01 UTC  

The goal of socialism is to establish communism

2019-07-12 05:29:06 UTC  

a system in which everyone is equal

2019-07-12 05:29:09 UTC  

and delegate managerial duties to them

2019-07-12 05:29:15 UTC  

not necessarily

2019-07-12 05:29:16 UTC  

No, not everyone is equal under communism

2019-07-12 05:29:26 UTC  

you're speaking of marxism specifically

2019-07-12 05:29:27 UTC  

In a system with no property, no government, and no money

2019-07-12 05:29:44 UTC  

From each according to their ability to each according to their needs - that's not a matter of equality, nothing in there says that

2019-07-12 05:30:01 UTC  

Socialism and Communism sound like Hinduism but lame and no market economy.

2019-07-12 05:30:16 UTC  

well socialism doesn't mean there can't be a market economy

2019-07-12 05:30:18 UTC  

I bet if you asked Marx right now, he'd probably scoff at the idea of equality

2019-07-12 05:30:21 UTC  

depending on how it's defined at least

2019-07-12 05:30:38 UTC  

"From each according to their ability to each according to their needs" is advocating for equality of outcome dude

2019-07-12 05:30:44 UTC  

No it isn't

2019-07-12 05:30:50 UTC  

Not really

2019-07-12 05:31:07 UTC  

the relationship between marx and egalitarianism is a complicated one

2019-07-12 05:31:22 UTC  

If one produces more, and the other needs more, the extra the one produced goes to the other

2019-07-12 05:31:28 UTC  

it makes no mention of any exchange

2019-07-12 05:31:29 UTC  

it just goes.

2019-07-12 05:31:34 UTC  

It’s more the anarchists that are strictly egalitarian.

2019-07-12 05:31:38 UTC  

No, it's says Each according to their ability.

2019-07-12 05:31:43 UTC  

FROM each

2019-07-12 05:31:56 UTC  

>From each according to their ability
But also
>To each according to their needs

2019-07-12 05:32:10 UTC  

Your needs determine what you gain, you're not supposed to get more than you need

2019-07-12 05:32:17 UTC  

yeah

2019-07-12 05:32:22 UTC  

Everyone has what they *need*

2019-07-12 05:32:23 UTC  

and nothing more.

2019-07-12 05:32:28 UTC  

No, that's wrong