Socialism or capitalism doesn't matter in that regard

You can't sell it to anyone, because nobody can afford to buy the entire thing because you redistributed all the fucking wealth

if you're talking about socialism then it would just be collectively owned?

Furthermore redistributing the wealth is fucking retarded anyway, because even if you did somehow snap your fingers and do it, 0.05 seconds later someone would buy something and wealth would be uneven.

June collective ownership doesn't work beyond like 3-4 people.

i mean what do you mean by work

You have to give it to the state at that point

which isn't the same

no you don't

Redistribution of wealth doesn't mean equal wealth

Depends on what you mean by collective ownership

If you have a car, and 100 people own it, try to use the car.

I think you're misunderstanding the meaning of socialism

there are cooperative businesses with literally millions of employees

that's a lot more than 3 or 4

Socialism is supposed to plug all the holes basically so no one has to suffer, that's the theory at least

It's not supposed to make everyone equal

So do they pay a fee when they join the company to buy part of it

How the fuck does everyone owning everything in the entire company work
Someone bought the equipment.

someone handles the money and signs paychecks

It doesn't need to be owned by everyone, how often do I have to explain that

Socialism doesn't say anything about equality

Then who is the 'collective'

yeah usually the owners vote on the managerial staff

The goal of socialism is to establish communism

a system in which everyone is equal

and delegate managerial duties to them

not necessarily

No, not everyone is equal under communism

you're speaking of marxism specifically

In a system with no property, no government, and no money

From each according to their ability to each according to their needs - that's not a matter of equality, nothing in there says that

Socialism and Communism sound like Hinduism but lame and no market economy.

well socialism doesn't mean there can't be a market economy

I bet if you asked Marx right now, he'd probably scoff at the idea of equality

depending on how it's defined at least

"From each according to their ability to each according to their needs" is advocating for equality of outcome dude

No it isn't

Not really

the relationship between marx and egalitarianism is a complicated one

If one produces more, and the other needs more, the extra the one produced goes to the other