the relationship between marx and egalitarianism is a complicated one

If one produces more, and the other needs more, the extra the one produced goes to the other

it makes no mention of any exchange

it just goes.

It’s more the anarchists that are strictly egalitarian.

No, it's says Each according to their ability.

FROM each

>From each according to their ability
But also
>To each according to their needs

Your needs determine what you gain, you're not supposed to get more than you need

yeah

Everyone has what they *need*

and nothing more.

No, that's wrong

That's central planning

Ie if I had cancer a doctor would give me treatment because the Kingdom of Heaven on Earth has been established

You literally just said "You are not supposed to get more than you need"

You're not supposed to get more than you need by means of socialism, but you can enrich yourself further beyond your needs

Granted they do anyway because marxism is retarded

AFTER all people's needs are met

There is what is SUPPOSED to happen and what ACTUALLY happens in the case of these... systems.

If everyone's needs are met, you can enrich yourself. The true problem of communism lies beyond this idea. It's not about equality.

If this was a product it would sound exactly like a pyramid scheme.

Jack, I know the realistic problems of communism, but we're talking about the theory

For reference we're talking about equality of outcome yes

In theory, equality doesn't matter in communism

Commies believe that moral faults will fade away when capitalism is abolished. Society is then supposed to be purely altruistic.

which its not

Not necessarily equal.

You gotta at least acknowledge the theory first, because you would want the same courtesy from others about your own ideas

Then you can go into the realizability

Marx was actually a lot less radical than today's AntiFa type

Communism is less radical than the idea of strict equality

it's less equality of outcome and more the unconditional sating of material wants and needs predicated on hyperabundance

Really? The Constant revolution guy is less radical?

Sadly, yes

Man.

Marx only predicted the revolution, he didn't say there has to be a revolution

And he predicted wrongly

There will be no revolution, at least not for the reasons he thought

Heres my results lol