Message from @ETBrooD

Discord ID: 600365933151911957


2019-07-15 16:25:39 UTC  

Literally all they had to do was use a different codename. Heck, they could create a whole new franchise within the Bond universe following 001, 002, 003…

2019-07-15 16:26:50 UTC  

006 was the bad guy in one right?

2019-07-15 16:26:53 UTC  

or a traitor or some shit

2019-07-15 16:29:10 UTC  

Was he Sean Bean?

2019-07-15 16:30:27 UTC  

Yeah

2019-07-15 16:30:30 UTC  

cause he died

2019-07-15 16:31:28 UTC  

I'd actually encourage them to do more swapping of gender/race etc., ideally with ALL of movie history, so that every known protagonist ever will henceforth be non-white

2019-07-15 16:31:44 UTC  

non-male
non-straight
etc.

2019-07-15 16:32:06 UTC  

Sounds a bit gay tbh

2019-07-15 16:32:19 UTC  

The point is

2019-07-15 16:33:20 UTC  

If they do it unobstructed, it'll redpill just about every non-radical movie-goer

2019-07-15 16:33:28 UTC  

They do know that bond films were based on books.

2019-07-15 16:33:59 UTC  

They're doing it slowly and even this is redpilling the masses very slowly

2019-07-15 16:34:06 UTC  

Imagine what would happen if they did it rapidly

2019-07-15 16:34:29 UTC  

It would cause the left to implode

2019-07-15 16:35:31 UTC  

Why do people call Hitler the bad guy, but Mussolini is being somewhat sidelined? Because Hitler was more "successful", or more radical

2019-07-15 16:35:50 UTC  

It comes down to optics

2019-07-15 16:37:31 UTC  

"Screw your optics, I'm going in!"

2019-07-15 16:38:30 UTC  

Ultimately I see it as Germany being a very competent nation vs Italy which is known for its pizza and gelato

2019-07-15 16:39:46 UTC  

and losing almost as much as France...

2019-07-15 16:39:52 UTC  

Well sure, that too. My takeaway is that optics are directly proportional to scale.

2019-07-15 16:40:32 UTC  

lol France hasn't actually lost often

2019-07-15 16:40:38 UTC  

but w/e 😉

2019-07-15 16:40:53 UTC  

Yeah I would agree with that. Also Mussolini had impracticle goals while Hitler's goals were daring, but not beyond possibility.

2019-07-15 16:41:53 UTC  

That goes way beyond my knowledge

2019-07-15 16:42:30 UTC  

Hitler accomplished all of his goals but his interference in his own plans ensured he couldn't hold onto them.

2019-07-15 16:42:51 UTC  

Ya he shouldn't have blamed and gassed the Jews

2019-07-15 16:42:54 UTC  

Big mistake

2019-07-15 16:43:16 UTC  

He also shouldn't have redirected his assault on Moscow when they were only 50 miles away with almost 0 hard resistance

2019-07-15 16:44:03 UTC  

Hitler was bluffing throughout most of his conquests

2019-07-15 16:44:39 UTC  

The more I'm studying his wars, the more I come to believe that, had just one nation called his bluff, he would've been stopped

2019-07-15 16:44:52 UTC  

In the beginning definitely

2019-07-15 16:45:15 UTC  

Germany's army was not mechanized.

2019-07-15 16:46:12 UTC  

The English and French were and their biggest blunder was not advancing into Germany. They would've easily dominated.

2019-07-15 16:46:37 UTC  

Well, not sure about domination, but

2019-07-15 16:46:53 UTC  

France was weakened, so that's the one I understand the most

2019-07-15 16:47:03 UTC  

But Austria simply gave up, we didn't fight at all

2019-07-15 16:47:38 UTC  

I doubt Hitler could've annexed Austria had we actually faced him

2019-07-15 16:48:24 UTC  

To me it looked like Austria was kind of meh about it.

2019-07-15 16:48:54 UTC  

From all the wars, I know about Austria's annexation the most

2019-07-15 16:49:35 UTC  

Most articles and books I've read mostly focus on the invasion of France