Message from @Tonight at 11 - DOOM
Discord ID: 620955588096163880
"Also, you're forgetting much of the federal bureaucracy operates on renewal, and thus they're not permanent."
I'm not forgetting that, I didn't know. Not a Mutt.
That's correct.
Now, going back to the neglecting of economic development interests among many districts, including those of liberal support, this would largely cease to continue, meaning you address some of the most fundamental reasons why people have continued to chart the path of populism among both the left and right. So, I don't see it as an immediate solution, but one that tempers our ailments moving forward, @Tonight at 11 - DOOM. Over all, it's a long-term solution toward shifting the balance of power over to the many, neglected districts across the U.S., out of the hands of the few in a position of economic scale. The long-term outcome of uniformed growth across this country is a counter to current policy motives. Think about how that would change us moving forward.
And, @Eccles, I'm not sure what you mean by claiming the party system would take control of appointments away from the district. I see this as a way to change the character of the parties, as party leadership is found in the Senate, something you inherently change by way of this alteration.
I don't believe that at all
Political parties are centrally controlled and indentured to their vested interests
This isn't going to change unless you switch to PR
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49582852
I had to share this news i found with you all.
Jesus bbc
Racial lens much
If anything, they were too blind on religion...
maybe if the CIA had hired more Muslim extremists they'd know what the Muslim extremists were going to do <:BIGBRAIN:501101491428392991>
@Tonight at 11 - DOOM nah it was definitly too white
Figure this one out for me: US embassies have LGBT attaches, but no religious expert attaches even thou religion is *clearly* more prominent a political force in the world then LGBT shit.
Fucking country of Hindus ruled over by Swedes... Your elite hates religion so much, it doesn't remember it exists...
So, is that article suggesting that CIA needed more brown people in it because brown people think like terrorists?
Racial identiterianism is cancer upon the western world.
Honestly someone should make some weird serum that makes everyone white...
So finally... The world is at peace *Second degree 9000*
It's not only cancer. It's even cancer from an ethno-nat perspective...
By the way, @Tonight at 11 - DOOM, they were appointed by the respective States' legislature, meaning you'd wipe the Democrats out of the Senate. 😉 You initially asked whether I'd have House members from New York selecting the Senators of fly-over country, but they'd have no say.
Eccles did
My apologies, @Tonight at 11 - DOOM; that's for you, @Eccles.
Imagine being more ideologically attached to your unrelated neighbor of similar skin colour to you, then to your 'mixed-race' kid AND thinking that makes sense from a ethno-nationalist perspective. It's literally retarded.
I'll second your idea of a serum.
👏
Pump it into the water supplies.
Are we the Roman Empire at its peak?
And about to collapse?
Let's do it.
Settle down, Stefan.
Leftists already want us to have Anti depressors in our water supplies.
Let's give them a taste of their own medicine.
God, I hate molymeme
If everyone is white... Everyone is privileged.
This is from the said news, what do you think about this statement?
``` There is a science to putting together the right minds, with perspectives that challenge, augment, diverge and cross-pollinate rather than parrot, corroborate and restrict. This is set to become a key source of competitive advantage for organisations, not to mention security agencies. This is how wholes become more than the sum of their parts.```
I think it's a meme unworthy of discussing
Problem i think is that too often people who are prone to tell others how to handle their "diverse thoughts" are not too keen to employ the said process themselves.
This might apply here too.
That's a rather ambiguous quote you've shared with us, @Omsomething. The question of who is claiming to have superiority over "challenging, augmenting, diverging and cross-pollinating" is important.