Message from @Lios
Discord ID: 615339458396422148
id vote stalin worse, mao mostly had the numbers because of populations
but i guess that depends how you quantify evil
i prefer just not to use the word i guess
Mao had a personal investment in his objective and results, though.
Stalin might not have even been involved in some of the atrocities.
id say stalin was pragmatist and he aimed at top so he did everything to climb and remain on top
2nd article doesn't even....list the USSR population
both of them took a peasant non mechanized society into a superpower
nice fucking try BabaBooey
where workers were actually celebrated.
it's a bunch of sports shit
Slav-land was already set to become a superpower, and China just needed people to shut up and be controlled.
they werent actually celebrated tho
they were celebrated on paper
It took me a single minute to fucking debunk Baba, nice
<:smugon:512048583806025739>
It's never designed to be hard...
what stalin did was he created new workers class out of enemies of state
who produced goods for rest of society
Didn't work for very long. Bastille day should have taught people that vilifying the rich despots doesn't get rid of the rich despots.
paul robeson: "when i first stepped on soviet soil i felt for the first time a human being, no colored prejudice like in mississippi or washington dc"
Citation needed @BabaBooey
i mean i dont think anybody will deny that autocracy has certain miliaristic and short term advantages
saying that to the fascists of the "Committee of unamerican activities"
>quoting shit without linking it
mfw
BabaBooey isn't even trying to change our minds
he's just speaking out of his ass
Autocracy is pretty much a necessary thing.
not even doing it well, too
Communism good fellas
it just be good
i mean i wouldnt lie
heres the interview
>the Nazis didn't discriminate against Blacks
lmao
"The first time i stepped on soviet i finally felt for the first time a true human being"
At what point does he say that