Message from @Lios
Discord ID: 616004947955154945
Figgle niggle
i disagree strongly
It was funny for a while, then it got sad
won't take but a fraction of the world arsenal
We dont have *nearly* enough nukes to fuck the entire planet
If all the city targets of nukes went up in smoke, you'd get a nuclear winter
Radiation does not have the effect of causing a winter
a single exchange between two powerswith the current deforestation trends could corrupt the food chain
nuclear radiation from weapons is nowhere near enough to cause trouble
We used to have enough nukes, then we decided it was probably a bad idea
Imagine demanding that sanitary services clan up your toilet where you tried to flush a shitstained blanket
That's china in a nutshell
No
We never did
no what?
we are not voices in your head
It could take a thousand times more nukes than we ever had, still wouldn't in themselves trigger a nuclear winter *unless* they are all hitting burnable material.
We would need around 100x the nuclear stockpile to kill 99.99% of humans
it's not just about detonations
I know
I'm gonna need a citation for this
it's about the systems abilty to recover
Busy_later
This sounds like fallout rp material
Werkom to china, laowai skum
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/15/wild-chinese-sturgeon-on-brink-of-extinction-in-polluted-yangtze#img-1
You don't need x amount of explosions.
weaker system = less nukes required
you just need lots of fire and ash.
^^
Yup
Remember, lads, it's not 12 years, it's 8 months left before global warming murders us all <:smugon:512048583806025739>
The Yangtze is more polluted than every river in Europe iirc
the nukes do little damange aside from throwing dirt into the air
a million nukes hitting the same spot won't cause a nuclear winter
you got into the bleach as a kid didn't you
that is why nukes are set to go over just over the ground
no
it is the dust and blast wave that does the real damage
<:smugon:512048583806025739>
Certain geographies are largely unaffected by ash in the air