Message from @The Burn
Discord ID: 621815466150723594
In times of war, all options are on the table, especially with the PRC. We don't give a shit about preserving the property rights for their unofficially managed state-cartels.
They can literally eternally promise a game to these paypiggies, and then abscond without finishing it
Why bother finishing if they pay anyway?
There is no incentive
in theory, such a cache of USD would be a hidden inflation bubble, money that wouldn't show up on any indicator
Let them have such a cache.
and at time of their choosing, they could flood the market with those USD AND call in their debts
That's fine.
that would send the western economies into free fall
We'll suck all that right up.
No, you're fooling yourself.
and of course, like jp morgan and other, they will have quietly exited the market just before hand
this had been the danger ever since the 90s when the last of our tariffs were removed
Have the channels been deleted or have i been exiled?
it's also why cash is being quietly phased out
cash shows inflation immediately
ACH deductions between your employer and a bank don't; they are just IOUs that cancel out
only recorded on a bank ledger
because youre a negro
they know
you have to have the invisible whites only rank
is this server ded
take a picture wit your skin tone and pm it to anubis
then hell give you the rank
Wait who
anubis
Can I get ranked up
wtf
for the whites only rank only
If I prove I'm part of the master race?
its hidden
make sure your picture has the timestamp on it
Shit I forgot Finns ain't white
Fuck
Cant do it
GodManAnimalEmperor Today at 5:08 PM
"It has long been suspected that China has been simply sitting on a large cache of USD, willing to not make interest on it in order to build economic leverage"
This sounds like anti-laissez faire propaganda, which I don't disagree we shouldn't trade with them at all, but you're blowing this out of proportion. The PRC isn't sitting on trillions of USD, while they're only sitting on ~$1t in t-notes.
most modern economist continually confuse 'market value' which is a function of supply/demand with 'cost' which is additionally a function of the number of dollars in circulation. that last element is a big ?