This is a pretty good recent one about ancestry and iq https://www.mdpi.com/2624-8611/1/1/34/htm

God bless, you autistic little snownigger.

Also on crossdressing, traps are based and redpilled because instead of trying to be a woman and failing, they recognize the inferiority of a femoid and ascend to a higher plain of attractiveness.

Bobby gets it

There are about 300 million guns in the U.S.

And we had 10,265 firearms murders in the U.S. last year. (if you thought the # was much higher that is because the media mixes in Suicided & even the deaths of Attacker who are stopped legally by gun owners and they call it "Gun Deaths" Not Murders)

So if every gun was only used for one murder.

The average American gun would be used in a murder once every 29,225 years!

> 50%–80% of the African-/European-American cognitive difference is due to genetic differences
<:hyperthink:462282519883284480>

The Feminist Case for Acknowledging Women's Acts of Violence

This Article makes a feminist case for acknowledging women’s acts of violence as consistent with — not threatening to — the goals of the domestic violence movement and the feminist movement. It concludes that broadly understanding women’s use of strength, power, coercion, control, and violence, even illegitimate uses, can be framed consistent with feminist goals. Beginning this conversation is a necessary — if uncomfortable — step to give movement to the movement to end gendered violence.

The domestic violence movement historically framed its work on a gender binary of men as potential perpetrators and women as potential victims. ....

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2790940

Also check out https://www.reddit.com/r/mensrightslinks/ which has a bunch of intersting studies. EG Subliminal Gender Stereotypes: Who Can Resist? (feminists more likely to sacrifice men in Moral Choice Dilema task)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29781373#

women abuse children more than men

yes men tend to pick fights with those able to hit back

https://childprotectionresource.online/mothers-are-more-likely-to-abuse-children-than-fathers-fact/ good article on that

Abuse is an umbrella term though

the most powerful weapon in your research is the "early life" section on wikipedia

bobby that article is great, the author is deluding herself so hard

she is claiming that because a child abused by solely the father will die 13 in 10 000 cases as compared to a child abused solely by the mother dying 12 in 10 000 cases, fathers kill **more** children than mothers

i mean abortion is a thing and that does kill the child. I dont see fathers doing abortions

looking for a pandora box? have one here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4903140/

Mothers are more likely to abuse children, because abuse isn't always physical and a lot of women are actually unaware of how their manipulation (i.e. conditions placed on a bond with a child) can be as just as if not more damaging to a child.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/428110493266346004/531891899439775755/17a-bale-Islamism_and_Totalitarianism.pdf
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/428110493266346004/531891958113894410/17b-hansen_en_kainz_radical_iIslamism_and_totalitarian_ideology.pdf
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/428110493266346004/531892145393631232/14-Browning_en_Siegelbaum_-_Social_Engineering.pdf
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/428110493266346004/531892256735756310/07-riegel_marxism_2005.pdf
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/428110493266346004/531892306220154880/03-vondung_nazism_2005.pdf
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/428110493266346004/531892355821862912/05-sternhell-fascism.pdf
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/428110493266346004/531892460444450827/04-malia_tragedy.pdf
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/428110493266346004/531892530862620674/08-griffin-biopolitical_modernism.pdf
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/428110493266346004/531892611640852492/13-hoffmann_biopolitics.pdf
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/428110493266346004/649982904192991232/01-gentile_critical_survey_2005.pdf
These are a bunch of studies on 'Political Religions' that I e-mailed to Sargon a few years ago. I do not know if he ever saw them but I am reposing them here so you can all read them. I have a few more I will send those later.

The Dreaded "Not only do police shootings not occur as often as one thinks, but White people are more likely to be shot" Study

https://www.pnas.org/content/116/32/15877

On the topic of homosexual domestic violence and internalised self hatred, ive come across people in abusive relationships like these before and in my observation it almost always happens with more feminine males and transbian couples. something about them seems to dispose them to being abusive, ive seen no shortage of trans girls and femme gay guys taking their insecurities and personal issues out on others. there was one girl in a community i was in who would routinely call people fat and disgusting for having normal male bodies (think 140 lbs with a bit of muscle and a healthy amount of fat), and generally go about putting others down wherever she could for being less femme than her. this girl was a 110 lbs trans girl who used to be 90 lbs, and at one point during an argument over her behaviour she told everyone that her girlfriend regularly beats her. rarely do i ever see masculine people, including FtM trans people, actually being malicious towards others. the LGBT community has serious issues.

Princeton prof attempts to discredit story because "The study didn't look at the motivation behind the officers shooting minorities; plus it apparently didn't take into account that both Non-white and White officers can be biased against African Americans"

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/08/study-claims-white-police-no-more-likely-shoot-minorities-draws-fire

The indoctrination is strong with this one.

@donut eating whore
It's almost like weak people are more likely to abuse others, as the prophet Jordan Peterson has prophesized.

pretty much

its not even a peterson thing, so much as it is a common observation. the people who put down others are almost always those who are the weakest on a mental level, and feel the need to take their misery out on others.

Ya, I was just making a joke because what you said made so much sense.

@Nico94 the scariest thing is that there is a possibility that we all live in theocracies, we just don't really know the name of our gods

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x also going to post this in here, the largest ever study on the subject of diversity

@Bobby pretty wired man...<:comfort:592107824826417204>

@Bobby what do you mean by theocracies with unknown gods?

I'm not sure we all live in theocracies... but I can guarantee you that no civilization of any kind can exist without commonly held beliefs of some kind, so all communities lend themselves to some form of rule by doctrine.

@Jeremy-Retard read up on the cult of reason, worshipping the mind. You cannot separate the human from the divine as we have evolved in tandem. There hasn't been a single civilization without a god or gods, and the fact that we rationalized away some old gods does not mean that we haven't substituted them with others. In fact, not having a name for them is more dangerous since the people who really possess that information may meld reality to their will. It's why demons store their power in their names, stuff like Rumpelstiltskin and other mythological creatures. The blue color thing etc.

I think we're saying the same thing Bobby. I don't disagree with anything you said. I grew up in a christian cult, so I have face-to-face memories of what that was like.

Concepts like "the worker", "the volk", "equality", "freedom", "constitution", "founding fathers", "democracy" all contain within themselves a mythological magic word power lense

And I think that the scariest thing of all is that when you refuse to host Jesus inside your heart, you don't get a vacuum, but you get Satan's cock in that hole

Vacuums don't really exist, even the word vacuum fills it up

Neurotheology is a very interesting field and there's evidence to suggest the inability of a man to be an atheist

The limitations of human perception mean that only a madman goes through life without beliefs. We have to believe something, even if that something is that there's no one behind us about to stab us in the back (the mind projects where it cannot see). More importantly, we act on those beliefs. If we believe that there's someone behind us about to kill us, we will spin around and shoot a gun trying to eliminate the threat. We act on what we believe, so if we believe nonsense, we will perform evil.

Since we cannot go through life without substituting belief for where we lack knowledge, and humans will act based on their beliefs, and since we have large portions of the population who have trouble understanding lots of things that science has revealed, the absolute necessity of religion in human existence should not be questioned as religion is structured belief that at the very least attempts to get individuals to treat each other with love.

I think the figure of Jesus Christ is a good one to have as the basis for your beliefs, even if it created some of the worst ideologies that exist today. Especially the holiness and the percieved moral superiority of poverty