Message from @PastPresentFuture
Discord ID: 467397819356020736
To this you've made no answer.
You don't trust the codex but you claim that the decoder ring that was given with the codex is faulty? You don't accept the codex nevermind the ring.
You offered novel misinterpretations to everything I've said, LOL.
Name one
Already did. Done. Waste of time. Bye.
Name one interpretation of the Bible I've offered that I produced from my own imagination
What place does an idolator have arguing what is true doctrine and what is heretical?
I have said nothing about myself except, when pressed by you, to say it's strongly implied that I have not achieved theosis. And somehow this is touting myself as an intellectual?
could the song of God sing through you as if you were his instrument?
I make music and sometimes I do cover songs. But it's much more beautiful when I am allowed to just let go and see what happens. Doesn't happen as often as I want.
That's too poetic for my taste but yes?
Oh you mean actual music.
its a parable i guess, but literal works
and it has a reverse-sanskrit meaning. song of God in sanskrit is Bhagavad Gita
It’s hot in here
That type of "Christianity" is a really evil deception.
I think so.
Folks, this thread is intended to let everyone partake in a conversation. I predict it will be mostly religious views and philosophy but not limited to just that. If you have something to bring to the table put it down. If you are a hypocrite it will become self evident.
correct me with impunity
@Sar the deceiver uses the mind to put you under the illusion of his lie. And that lie is intellect, knowledge, and judgment. Playing god is the original sin, and going to others as a godly figure of your intellect is of that same nature.
I’m not calling anyone out in that previous message just clarifying for y’all.
So then the Bible is not self-consistent?
I don’t know sar I’ve never read the Bible and took the time to check that.
If the Bible isn't self-consistent, how can one make any arguments based on the Bible that "intellect, knowledge, and judgment" are lies.
If Hake doesn't follow the Bible and PPF doesn't know whether the Bible is self-consistent, how is it possible to advance any opinion on doctrine
You would have to go back and argue whether the Bible is reliable, self-consistent, etc.
If we don't agree on what the color Red is we can't argue whether something is Red
Jesse asked a great question: Do you give spiritual advice? You can have all knowledge, but if you don't have love, you're not living it and you are nothing, not helping anyone. Like the people trying to cast out demons by imitating the apostles yet without the power. You'll just get eaten alive, and people can see through you. You're turning them off and don't know it.
It seems like your point of argument is based in your pride in your intellect of the Bible.
This isn't a life counseling chat, this is doctrinal discussion chat
It seems to you that way based on what?
Based on your intellect?
Based on what I see you doing
Haven't you agreed the heart is deceitful?
No
as far as i understand
Preaching the true gospel and countering the doctrine of demons does not make me feel good about myself
It is a chore and not appreciated by anyone