the guy reviews it

Ahh

Yep

I don't think I'd blame it entirely on the cultural revolution.

Chinese were slave cattle way before that.

reminds me

https://youtu.be/26EivpCPHnQ

chinese history

kind of sad

The Chinese haircuts were even meant to be a symbol of slavery, and not having one was highly illegal.

unless you were from the ruling class, that is.

Handy vid @Boop / 브파 / C'thUwU, thnks

china be fugged

needs to get some good ol fashioned british empire conquererin

worked well for India

thats something

Maybe christianity will do them some good.

ive never really known of an indian person that lives in the UK as being a shitty or stupid person

Apparently it's spreading pretty fast

just a brown, curry smelling british person

Yeah, well... Not much sense de-weeding your veggie patch if you are seeding your neighbours with the same seeds.

KHHm.. Oogle

So, maybe it was time ppl started thinking of gov. backed tech oligarchs as invading forces... If you look at their modus operandi (and you know what each gov tends to devolve into) you pretty much have to admit politics is nothing like it used to be before mass digital oppression.

Same goes for 'fixing the planet'

undercover operations are done through blindspots (sometimes intentional) online

rather than secret notes and agents

kind of glad that NK and China has their own intranet search engine things...

kind of

In the case of India or any other country that was exposed to tech, infrastructure, western culture in general benefited from a short term boost. However very few could sustain or build upon and once the 'housekeepers' were gone they almost all slid back to almost square one. "You can take a horse to a..."

thats to be expected though

So, no. I don't think any nation can uplift any other nation in a meaningful way unless they too have the capacity to grasp, self-police, willingness to improve.

In which case they are already doing it.

you cant give equal water to all seeds and expect them to grow and look the same

and some seeds die because their compatability somewhere down the line failed

Yes. And that's why speaking about 'g' is herecy

i wouldnt say countries that fail have an 'inferior' population

it could be said, but the wording implies implications

Then how would you word the same meaning?

incompatible due to multiple and/or unaccounted factors

Incompatible as in different?

yea but it sounds too plain

objectively speaking, the country would be able to be defined as not as good