kind of

In the case of India or any other country that was exposed to tech, infrastructure, western culture in general benefited from a short term boost. However very few could sustain or build upon and once the 'housekeepers' were gone they almost all slid back to almost square one. "You can take a horse to a..."

thats to be expected though

So, no. I don't think any nation can uplift any other nation in a meaningful way unless they too have the capacity to grasp, self-police, willingness to improve.

In which case they are already doing it.

you cant give equal water to all seeds and expect them to grow and look the same

and some seeds die because their compatability somewhere down the line failed

Yes. And that's why speaking about 'g' is herecy

i wouldnt say countries that fail have an 'inferior' population

it could be said, but the wording implies implications

Then how would you word the same meaning?

incompatible due to multiple and/or unaccounted factors

Incompatible as in different?

yea but it sounds too plain

objectively speaking, the country would be able to be defined as not as good

And also not containing objective standards that we could use to evaluate both truthfully

considering one country has 8MBps internet and another doesnt have clean water

Same roots though

Incentives

environmental factors to account for as well

Indeed. How much?

europe was easier, because it had seasons

I thought tropical climates should be the leaders of the world as they had had it the 'easiest'

animals though

In some aspects, they have it a lot harder

i wouldnt imagine europe, being colder, would have as many mosquitos

But then I figured out there's something else, something which the military has figured out too

Nature vs Nurture is a false dichotomy. Your nature in turn influences your genetics over millennia and vice versa in a feedback loop.

travel and transportation of goods is significantly harder in SA and Africa

also africa has BULLETPROOF HIPPOS

just to note

Hahaha

Good to know

europe had lions, but they werent BULLETPROOF

It deferral of gratification, for those that are wondering...

also despite all reasons, can easily say some groups just happened upon certain beneficial things by coincidence

I strongly believe, due to it being a steady marker through all groups

True.
What they did with it is another story, right?

i wonder what infant mortality would be between mainland Europe and Uganda, 1 million years ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvaxPH3ftUQ

theres just plenty of moving parts that coming to any solid conclusion is arrogance at best