Message from @lungfish

Discord ID: 645092953345359892


2019-11-16 02:46:49 UTC  

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

2019-11-16 02:46:49 UTC  

Restate I lost the plot

2019-11-16 02:46:51 UTC  

Philosophically, in general

2019-11-16 02:47:02 UTC  

Regardless of what the goal is, should the path be the goal?

2019-11-16 02:47:29 UTC  

I think this constant disavowal of the Nazis is kind of sad and lacking in integrity. Everyone knows the WN love the nazis but they know they can't associate with it. It's an unfortunate position to be in

2019-11-16 02:47:30 UTC  

@whiic How come you and Hitler both drank water?

2019-11-16 02:47:41 UTC  

Uh I don’t quite follow sorry @ETBrooD

2019-11-16 02:47:47 UTC  

@lungfish Not really

2019-11-16 02:47:53 UTC  

It's a philosophical question

2019-11-16 02:47:59 UTC  

Many WN detest Nazis

2019-11-16 02:47:59 UTC  

Whatever your goal is

2019-11-16 02:48:08 UTC  

Like the ends justify the means?

2019-11-16 02:48:09 UTC  

Do you agree that your path towards the goal should be the same as the goal itself?

2019-11-16 02:48:19 UTC  

its an unfortunate feat of bad genes that they think that way @lungfish

2019-11-16 02:48:22 UTC  

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

2019-11-16 02:48:28 UTC  

Specifically libertarian race realist types

2019-11-16 02:48:29 UTC  

@Monstrous Moonshine Many Revolutionary Communists detest Anarchocommunists and many of them detest Antifa.

2019-11-16 02:48:30 UTC  

"The ends justify the means" would be the opposite of path = goal

2019-11-16 02:48:42 UTC  

Doesn't make them that different, just tribal.

2019-11-16 02:48:45 UTC  

If they detest Nazis it's mainly over nuances, or their failure on Russia, or something to that effect

2019-11-16 02:49:05 UTC  

And mostly that detestation is performative; many of them (like me) have watched The Greatest Story Never Told

2019-11-16 02:49:21 UTC  

So like the goal should be to follow a good path? @ETBrooD

2019-11-16 02:49:32 UTC  

No, what I mean is this

2019-11-16 02:49:33 UTC  

Yeah, usual WN arguments against nazis aren't policies, it's strategic shortcoming of Hitler, loss to Slavs, not winning the war.

2019-11-16 02:49:36 UTC  

@lungfish It is over many things. Most of America was essentially WN till 1965, yet none of those would've had particular obsession with Nazis

2019-11-16 02:49:47 UTC  

And because tribally they want to be American variant of that, not pro-Germany.

2019-11-16 02:49:54 UTC  

where the blacks justifed in running out all the white people in south afrrica?

2019-11-16 02:50:02 UTC  

That's why they say USA was national socialists in the 40's.

2019-11-16 02:50:19 UTC  

And they kinda were. They had racial concentration camps.

2019-11-16 02:50:23 UTC  

Humans are tribal by nature

2019-11-16 02:50:27 UTC  

damn japs

2019-11-16 02:50:27 UTC  

There was an American Nazi movement which was reasonably successful but when we went to war with Germany that all ended because it was no longer acceptable to the mainstream

2019-11-16 02:50:36 UTC  

And nigger cannonfodder squads.

2019-11-16 02:50:44 UTC  

Using niggers like Imperial Guard.

2019-11-16 02:50:52 UTC  

the way god meant it to be

2019-11-16 02:50:53 UTC  

If your goal is, lets say, to put freedom above all, for example.
Is it ok to - on your way towards said freedom - infringe on some freedom, or not?

2019-11-16 02:51:11 UTC  

You can interchange "freedom" with anything else

2019-11-16 02:51:26 UTC  

When WN say they are not nazis, they mean they are "the good, American kind of nazi".

2019-11-16 02:51:36 UTC  

Policy wise, what is the difference?

2019-11-16 02:51:51 UTC  

AFAIK, same game, different teams.

2019-11-16 02:51:56 UTC  

So basically, my goal is a ethnostate, would it be ok to hurt...