I think he means somebody who has a spous, who has sex with their not spous

Well pre-marital sex is different because marriage assumes a responsibility of fidelity to one another.

I'd ideally discourage pre-marital sex though.

Particularly for women as increased numbers of pre-marital sex partners correlates to lower marriage success rates.

For women
Not that much for men

In that case I'd make a fucking banging husband

It doesn't really apply as much to men due to sexual evolution I think.

Male sexual selection is more polygamous when in a state of nature. Female can't really afford to be.

Nor is it practical.

A man could hypothetically impregnate a dozen women in just a few days or less depending on his recovery rate.

A woman can only carry one man's child at a time for 9 months.

And if she's going around fucking other men then that male will have no guarantee the child is his and won't have anything to do with her.

Women should marry at 14 and have a child every year until they are 35, change my mind

So, women who have a bit of a history of fucking many random men *not* doing well when it comes to stable committed monogamy really doesn't shock me.

However if you look at it through r/K selection, it applies closer to your original suggestion

For the sake of social order I think men ought to show self-discipline in that regard too but it's nowhere near as catastrophic if they *don't*.

Although for men to do so necessitates female involvement so if a man fucks twelve women then that's twelve women who can add one more pre-martial sex partner to their list.

I forget which is which, 'r' is a small number of children given many resources right?

Rabbit r

And 'K' is many children with minimal resources?

Oh.

So humans are K selection.

No, few with max involvement

Humans can be both

Well, I still think this applies to the natural human sexual selection.

The state of nature that dictated human mating patterns also killed about 50% of children before the age of 1.

Regardless of resource input.

That's not how it works. Humans are K. As most mammals are.

If a man wanted to ensure his line continued, it behooved him to have sex with many young, fertile women. And to do that required him to possess the resources that each female sought for her singular offspring.

So... of 20 potential children, 10 would die before the age of 1.

Less than 5 would probably make it to adulthood.

It kinda does.

Think of ppl buying luxuries and living of aid but having many offsprings

Vs.

A high IQ couple maybe having babies when the woman is 35+

Of course as society progressed humans stopped having as many children. Enough to counter the mortality rate but that was it.

Whites are k selected I question if nigs are

Estimated female fertility rate in the early Roman Empire was between 6 and 9 children per woman.

Most died before adulthood.

Some being closer to r than others doesn't make them k, when it's 80% vs 80.5%

There's r/K amongst every human ethnic group, the DISTRIBUTION is very different however historically and according to current trends